this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2024
511 points (98.7% liked)

Work Reform

9857 readers
527 users here now

A place to discuss positive changes that can make work more equitable, and to vent about current practices. We are NOT against work; we just want the fruits of our labor to be recognized better.

Our Philosophies:

Our Goals

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] picoblaanket@lemmy.ml 98 points 3 months ago (16 children)

It’s not as much as it seems…

The wage is only “for time spent traveling to pick up riders, and transporting them to their destination”.

  • No pay for driving back to the pickup area.

  • No pay for waiting when there are no fares.

It’s a per-minute wage, and only for certain minutes.

[–] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 51 points 3 months ago (14 children)

That sounds reasonable and still a massive upgrade for drivers.

[–] picoblaanket@lemmy.ml 35 points 3 months ago (13 children)

If you wait 10 minutes for a fare… give a 20-minute ride to some suburban house… and then drive 20 minutes back to the city…

your pay would be $10.83 (with this new deal).

…that’s very different from $32.50 per hour.

  • Does an airline baggage-handler only get paid for the “specific minutes” when he is lifting luggage?

  • Does a cashier only get paid for “specific minutes” when there are customers in her line?

The original goal of this lawsuit was to classify drivers as employees under state law…

And that goal was ignored completely.

[–] bitchkat@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

But why wouldn't you try and pick up a fare before driving 20 minutes back to the city?

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (13 replies)