47

I'm preparing for a new PC build, and I decided to try a new atomic OS after having been with NixOS for about a year.

First I tried Kinoite, then Bazzite, but even though KDE has a lot of features, I found it incredibly buggy, and it even had generally poor performance, especially in Firefox. I don't really have time to diagnose these issues, so I figured I would put in just a little more effort and migrate my Sway config to Fedora Sway Atomic.

I'm glad I did. The vanilla install of Fedora Sway is awesome. No bloat and very usable. I haven't noticed any bugs. Performance is excellent. And it was very straightforward to apply my sway config on top without losing the nice menu bar, since Fedora puts their sway config in /usr/share/sway.

I'm also quite happy with the middle ground of using an OSTree-based Linux plus Nix and Home Manager for my user config. I always thought that configuring the system-level stuff in Nix was the hardest part with the least payoff, but it was most productive to have a declarative config for my dev tools and desktop environment.

I originally tried NixOS because I wanted bleeding edge software without frequent breakage, and I bought into the idea of a declarative OS configuration with versioned updates and rollback. It worked out well, but I would be lying if I said it wasn't a big time investment to learn NixOS. I feel like there's a sweet spot with container images for a base OS layer then Nix and Home Manager for stuff that's closer to your actual workflows.

I might even explore building my own OS image on top of Universal Blue's Nvidia image.

Hope this path forward stays fruitful! I urge anyone who's interested in immutable distros to give this a try.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] poki@discuss.online 2 points 3 days ago
[-] tatterdemalion@programming.dev 2 points 3 days ago

Interesting. I am not having any issues with Firefox. Maybe I'm already running in XWayland somehow?

[-] poki@discuss.online 2 points 3 days ago

Maybe I’m already running in XWayland somehow?

That's definitely possible. Within Firefox, what does about:support reveal on this matter?

[-] tatterdemalion@programming.dev 2 points 3 days ago

So I'm seeing "Window Protocol: wayland" in about:support. Seems like somehow I'm just not affected by this issue.

[-] poki@discuss.online 2 points 3 days ago

We'd rather like to see that anyways 😜.

[-] tatterdemalion@programming.dev 2 points 3 days ago

Away from PC for a while but I'll check when I'm back.

this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2024
47 points (96.1% liked)

Linux

4348 readers
97 users here now

A community for everything relating to the linux operating system

Also check out !linux_memes@programming.dev

Original icon base courtesy of lewing@isc.tamu.edu and The GIMP

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS