this post was submitted on 01 Jul 2024
178 points (95.4% liked)

Free Software

1039 readers
1 users here now

What is free software?

Free software is software that respects the 4 software freedoms. The 4 freedoms are

Please note: Free software does not relate to monetary price. Free software can be sold or gratis (no cost)

Rules:

  1. Please keep on topic
  2. Follow the Lemmy.zip rules
  3. No memes
  4. No "circle jerking" or inflammatory posts
  5. No discussion of illegal content

Please report anything you believe to violate the rules and be sure to include rhetoric on why you think it should be removed.

If you would like to contest mod actions please DM me with your rational as to why you feel that the relivant mod action should be reversed. Remember to use rhetoric and to site any relevant sources. You will only get one chance to argue your point and continued harassment will result in a ban.

Overall this community is pretty laid back and none if the things list above normally are an issue.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

GPLv3 makes a company publish the source under the same license. That means no Vivaldi, Chrome, Edge or any other spyware ad ridden browsers. I don't think we need more lock in.

[–] sik0fewl@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I understand your reasoning, but I think your logic is flawed. If Ladybird is GPLv3, then browsers will continue to use Chromium base which helps the Chrome monopoly. By making it BSD, it will help others adopt it.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

We don't need that much adoption we just need a engine that is capable of not screwing over everyone. We already have plenty of proprietary browsers.

Admittedly BSD may help Ladybug get more funding and development efforts.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 months ago

I'd favour GPL3 too, but we do need wide adoption because that's the only way an independent browser will influence websites not to just design for Chromium. That needs to happen for the new browser to have any impact on Google's ability to dictate standards unilaterally.

[–] Oisteink@feddit.nl -2 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The privacy and freedom community

[–] Oisteink@feddit.nl 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

You guys should make a browser engine

[–] tabular@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Given the complexity of creating a new browser securely (or at all) then this suggestion is not good.

We already have projects that focus on smaller parts of a web browser (e.g a video player) which are free software. We should work on those and encourage their use over all browsers.

[–] Oisteink@feddit.nl 1 points 4 months ago

Easy enough - i assume you are working on one of these

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

That is a massive undertaking that hasn't been done in a very long time. Modern browsers have either been around for 20 years or are forks. (Sometimes both)

We are taking about creating something from scratch. That can take 5-10 years to do.

The good news is that we have plenty of tools on our tool belt. Think browsers such as Mull and Librewolf plus extensions like ublock.

[–] Oisteink@feddit.nl 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Oh - I thought thats what the story was about. Building a new browser engine.

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It is but it takes a lot of time

[–] Oisteink@feddit.nl 1 points 4 months ago

Well - I’m not part of the project but I respect the deveopers that are and that they make the right decision for their work or spare time.

If you are part of the project but feel that your effort is wasted you should indeed work on something else