this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2024
77 points (97.5% liked)
World News
32328 readers
555 users here now
News from around the world!
Rules:
-
Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
-
No NSFW content
-
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
China didn't want to get caught with proof killing Filipinos in Filipino claimed waters.
If they were found not helping, it was proof of their malevolence.
On the other hand, If they were found helping, it was merely because it was a cheap propaganda win and because they didn't want to get caught with proof killing Filipinos in Filipino claimed waters.
The Chinese ship actively blocking a rescue operation until they fully understood the potential blowback.
That's your bad faith interpretation based on what one party is saying about the incident. (Especially the "potential blowback").
Whereas Singaporean state media states more neutrally:
Which is reasonable, because China was operating on previous experiences. The Chinese adapted once they got more information about the situation (which they were under no obligation to and wouldn't do if they wouldn't have taken the Philippine Coast Guard in good faith). What did you want them to do? nOt bE tHeRE iN tHe FirsTplAce", amirite?
Why has there been such an influx of idiots lately?
you trying to imply they actually wanted to kill the person they rescued?
What are you talking about?
The words they used.
I am severely confused