537

When you compare Biden to Trump vs. the effects on the Palestinians, were Trump president again, he would not just help the Israelis exterminate the Palestinians, but encourage them to do so quickly- as he's already told Bibi to "finish it". So your dichotomy is more than a bit disingenuous .

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] AmbiguousProps 15 points 2 days ago

Vote in your local elections, and support (or directly work to pass) election reform laws, particularly related to ditching the electoral college.

Not necessarily saying it's the alternative, but it's a start and local elections have larger personal impact most of the time.

[-] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 14 points 2 days ago

I agree with all of this, but it's not an alternative, it's just an additional vector of action. My question is about alternatives to Biden for president in this election.

[-] AmbiguousProps 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Well, that's up to the DNC. They could put almost any other prominent dem and they'd probably beat Trump. The DNC also has the ability to change the candidate after the election but before the electoral ballots are cast, at least as far as I understand their rules.

Trust, I understand your point. The primaries are over, and that's where the different candidate should have been chosen. But unfortunately, the whole not knowing any viable alternatives line of thinking is what got the DNC into this mess in the first place.

[-] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago

Yeah, I think any other Dem candidate is a gamble: you lose out on the significant incumbent boost, you only have 4 months to campaign if you start now, and you risk losing momentum on the moderate vote. This isn't an election I want to gamble with, especially with the recent SCOTUS ruling. Everything said and done, I don't think the benefits outweigh the risks.

November 6th is when we should start pushing for significant changes. 11th hour fuckery isn't going to help this cycle.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Yeah, I think any other Dem candidate is a gamble: you lose out on the significant incumbent boost

Except Biden has a 37% approval rating...

That's Jimmy Carter level...

Do you know what happened with Jimmy Carter's second term?

An incumbency only translates to a boost, when being the incumbent is a positive thing.

2/3s of voters don't think Biden is a good president. 56% think he is a bad one.

We can't afford to hope enough people hold their nose for him.

This is bigger than any one person, even Joe Biden

[-] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 day ago
[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

That the DNC would let run?

Whitmere.

That would get the most votes?

AOC

[-] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 day ago

Neither one polls better than Biden.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Not in Data for Progress' poll...

They used to be good, but after Biden won 2020 and they started working with the DNC, things went downhill quickly.

During the 2022 midterms, their polls ended up overestimating Republican support.[14] The Tartan reported that the group's leader, Sean McElwee, was gambling on election results on the website PredictIt, raising ethical concerns.[15] McElwee left the firm in November 2022 amidst allegations of gambling on election results and artificially manipulating polling results to affect races that he had bet money on.[16] Additionally, it has been reported McElwee had inquired among his employees about having them participate in an illegal straw donor scheme.[16] Senior members of Data for Progress informed McElwee that they would resign en masse if he did not step down as the firm's executive director.[16]

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Data_for_Progress

Did you catch that?

and artificially manipulating polling results to affect races that he had bet money on.[16] Additionally, it has been reported McElwee had inquired among his employees about having them participate in an illegal straw donor scheme

He also bragged in the past about being able to come up with polls that would be likely to result in increased donations to the candidate paying for the poll...

Which worked here too. Because I've seen articles bragging about how much Biden has raised recently

Even before that, they were "quick and dirty" polling.

But that's a whole big can of worms to get into.

The important part is that these candidates are polling similar to Biden against Trump already.

And Biden has the full weight of the DNC behind him (at least up till last week) and an active campaign.

Obviously anyone that became the candidate and started campaign would see a jump.in their numbers unless it was someone like Hillary

[-] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 0 points 1 day ago

Which poll shows either Whitmer or AOC bearing Trump in the general?

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago

What?

You're just ignoring everything I say and asking different questions, even though I've already talked about it:

The important part is that these candidates are polling similar to Biden against Trump already.

And Biden has the full weight of the DNC behind him (at least up till last week) and an active campaign.

Obviously anyone that became the candidate and started campaign would see a jump.in their numbers unless it was someone like Hillary

[-] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

Ignoring your unfounded claims? Yes, I will continue to do that, because you haven't offered any proof for

these candidates are polling similar to Biden against Trump already.

other than just claiming it. And now that I'm asking for that proof, you're pretending I'm changing the subject.

I'll ask again: show me actual data which suggests Whitmer or AOC outperforms Biden against Trump in the general.

[-] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Mate...

You quoted a poll, I asked if it was the one I'm thinking of (because you didn't link it) and now you're demanding I link you the poll you brought up?

But fine, here's a poll that shows Whitmere polling competitively to Biden

https://www.cnn.com/2024/07/02/politics/cnn-poll-post-debate/index.html

And I never claimed her or AOC are polling better than Biden...

I’ll ask again: show me actual data which suggests Whitmer or AOC outperforms Biden against Trump in the general.

Like, I think you need to take a deep breath, maybe go get a glass of water, and read thru this thread again.

I say one thing, you say I said something else, and then insist on me defending the position you made up.

I'm willing to give you the benefit of the doubt because peoples emotions (rightfully) are elevated this election. But I'm pretty close to just blocking at this point because there's no way this ever becomes productive if you continue like this.

[-] agamemnonymous@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago

I didn't quote a poll, I said there were no polls supporting your conclusion. You assumed I was talking about a specific poll, and then attacked that poll.

Ipsos shows everyone but Harris and Michelle Obama well behind Biden.

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2024
537 points (87.9% liked)

Political Memes

4602 readers
4426 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS