this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2024
628 points (99.4% liked)

Not The Onion

12180 readers
787 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Crossposted from !worldnews@lemmit.online

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ggtdbz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

My thought process is that in the case of media I’m not accessing the same files over and over, at least not for most of the files. For a media archive it would make sense, to me at least. I’m not familiar with modern tape storage, I’m sure there’s many good reasons why this isn’t done (yet?).

Would be good for self hosted offsite backups too I’d imagine.

[–] AProfessional@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

You don’t get fast random access. So you have to read the whole tape if it’s near the end.