News
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
view the rest of the comments
Well this is the first time anyone has ever suggested I was privileged for having a minimum wage fast food job where sometimes customers didn't come in so we didn't have to work for a while.
You have a very strange idea of privilege if you think you can be privileged to have a job that doesn't pay a livable wage. Or a fast food job at all.
During downtime, were you not expected to clean, restock, & prep for the next rush? If not, then your store was run by a dunce, and that would also constitute as your privilege.
If you knowingly sat on your ass, taking pay, while your coworkers did those jobs… that makes you a dick, but a privileged dick nonetheless.
You are claiming that “downtime” is unpaid time at work, but you know you were likely supposed to be working on something.
An unspoken agreement with management to chill out after the rush, as a reward for working the rush in the first place… yep, you guessed it! That’s a privilege.
Those people took those jobs because the pay structure & work requirements suit their needs. Get off your soapbox & leave ‘em be.
I have literally never heard anyone call a fast food job privileged before just because sometimes there's downtime. That's the weirdest claim I have ever heard.
Cool, so we better not pay them more money because giving the disabled more money to spend would be bad for some reason.
Really, paying them what anyone non-disabled would have to legally be paid for the exact same job would just be an insult to them. I know I get insulted every time I get paid more money at my very privileged jobs that you are certain I have had.
Nobody’s saying don’t pay them more money. You’re just refusing to acknowledge that this is not an hourly based job, it is a performance based job.
If you take a performance based job, & you either underperform or don’t perform, you aren’t getting paid.
If you want more money for your performance, you negotiate a rate based on each performance, not how long each performance takes.
If you go under contract, you’ve agreed to the terms of that contract. These people agreed to this contract you’re so perplexed by.
You have the privilege of going to work each day & getting paid an agreed upon amount based on the time you spend doing your job.
These folks have the privilege of potentially spending less time on the job, while getting paid the same, depending on how fast they perform.
There are privileges on both sides.
Did you ever think maybe they agreed to the contract because they didn't think that Goodwill would give them any more money even if they wanted it?
What if what if what if…
Did you ever think maybe they took the job because it suited their needs & they didn’t want to have to fuck with a 9-5?
Did you ever think maybe the jobs are low paying because they really aren’t that important & serve more purpose as structure than income?
Your argument is that the job is bad because the terms are bad, but no one is twisting anyone’s arm to take the jobs.
The jobs get taken because there are people that want that type of flexibility.
Yes they want more money, we all want more money, but you don’t get to shit on their employment opportunities because they have different priorities than you do.
No, my argument is that no one should be paid less than minimum wage for any reason.
…but they ARE GETTING PAID THE SAME WAGE
You work 2 hours @ $15, you get $30
You build two widgets @ $15, you get $30
The only difference here is for the first job you’ve agreed to a payment of $15/hour regardless of how many widgets you make & for the second job you’ve agreed to a payment of $15/widget regardless of how long it takes.
Job A: you can dick around for 6 hours & still make $90
Job B: if you can make 6 widgets in 15 minutes, you’ve just made $90 & you get to keep your extra 5.75 hours.
This isn’t complicated. Nobody’s forcing these people to hit a quota, they work at their own pace & are paid accordingly.
I’m guessing you just want to fight over something right now, so you’re intentionally being obtuse. This really is a simple concept that comes down to the workers preference.
Nope, I just want people to be paid for their time and not what they're able to do within that time.
Paying people for productivity is ultracapitalist and Protestant work ethic cruelty.
But I guess that's just the privileged outlook I took away from that privileged fast food job I worked.
If someone doesn’t want to work for 8 hours a day, can make the same money in 3 hours, by your logic… fuck ‘em? By your logic they still owe this capitalist state 5 hours of their time & you aren’t happy until they serve it?
You can keep it.
Equal compensation is just based on time spent pal. Equal compensation is equal regardless of whether you work slowly or quickly.
Okay, then why pay people an hourly wage at all? Let's just pay everyone on how much they are able to accomplish. The harder you work, the more you get paid.
Because not all jobs are the same. People have different needs, different types of jobs offer options.
Stay at home partner, working from home, with multiple kids & schedules might enjoy an hourly wage position or a performance based position to account for at home needs.
Same may be true for someone reentering the workforce after incarceration… building usb cables at home, while studying for a certification, worked extremely well for a family member. Made a little money on the side AND had time to study.
Personally, I work from home writing technical manuals. I get paid hourly, rather than by document, because that’s my preference. I use my left over paid time learning this company’s platform so I can take on a bigger role.
That said, my coworkers are all performance based employees. They get paid based on the metric of production rather than time. Same job, same company, same department… different priorities.
Oh, you mean you get a preference? Unlike disabled people who can only get hired by companies like Goodwill?
Also, all of this vociferous defense of Goodwill paying disabled people less than minimum wage seems to ignore the fact that a whole bunch of disabled people are saying that they're being underpaid by Goodwill and I'm not sure why you're not taking that into account.
You started your post with "listen up, dick" even though I never insulted you, so I can't agree with that claim.
This is an adult conversation, is it?
It was until someone got report happy. So I’ll repeat my comment in a more civil manner:
Do I detest Goodwill as a corporation? Absolutely.
Do I think disabled people deserve better pay? Absolutely.
Do I think you’ve acknowledged that your local goodwill supports your neighbors? Nope.
Do I think you’ve acknowledged your local Goodwill maybe the only community support organization helping your queer neighbors & non Christian neighbors? Nope.
Do I think you’ve tried to boil an incredibly complex socio-economic support organization into a rage bait headline? Absolutely.
Do I think you’re unable to actually comprehend how complex your neighborhood truly is & what good that local Goodwill might be willing to bring to the table? Absolutely.
Do I think you’ll reply with a miseducated reconstitution of my words to support your narrative? You betcha!
I got "report happy" because you kept breaking incivility rule.
Because it was irrelevant to both my point and the links I posted.
Because it was irrelevant to both my point and the links I posted.
I posted two links to support my point, you apparently didn't notice.
Also not relevant to my point, but again uncivil, so I will again get "report happy."
"Miseducated" isn't a word.
My only point this entire time is that Goodwill doesn't pay disabled people enough. You apparently agree, so I'm not sure why you've been so hostile.
You almost managed to be civil the entire time and then you got to the last sentence. I have not insulted you, I have not been aggressive with you, I have been nothing but cordial. If you want to have an adult conversation, one would think the least you could do would be to not reciprocate with anger, aggression and insults.
Miseducated: the past participle of miseducate, or to inform wrongly
“FlyingSquid is a miseducated individual who enjoys spreading miseducation with the sole intent to miseducate.”
you my friend, are in fact… miseducated.
Again, if you want to have an adult conversation, one would think the least you could do would be to not reciprocate with anger, aggression and insults.
It sounds like when you claimed you were wanting an adult discussion, you were being highly dishonest.
Also, if you talk to your friends like this, I pity them. However, I am not the friend of someone who talks to me like you do.
Well given that you don’t seem to care about your neighbors well being, I pity them.
I’m not the one who started throwing around misinformation and miseducation about employment opportunities that impact my neighbors, you did.
You want an adult conversation? Go talk to someone who relies on those jobs you’re so fond of disparaging.
Take care Richard.
None of my neighbors work at Goodwill.
And you were the one who said you wanted an adult conversation. You've shown none of that.
Also, I'm disparaging the job for the same reason all the disabled people in the articles I pasted that you didn't apparently read are complaining about them, so it's pretty ironic that you're claiming I'm the one who doesn't care about the well being of the people who rely on those jobs... by saying they should be paid more.
None of your neighbors work at goodwill, but how many of them rely on it?
That’s the point. You can’t see two feet past the disabled argument & so you’ve taken to disparaging jobs that non disabled people benefit & rely on. Aka, YOUR NEIGHBORS.
Once again, I’ll refer you to your local goodwill for an adult conversation. Go talk to someone who has just reentered the workforce & tell them the job they rely on should disappear because you don’t like it.
Go on, actually interact with these people if you’re so certain they don’t need the help those jobs offer.
You don’t care about the reality behind those jobs, you only care about how good it makes you feel to prattle on about corporate ills on the internet, rather than truly get involved.
Like I said, take care Richard.
I'm pretty sure I never said Goodwill shouldn't hire people at all, so I have no idea where you're getting that from.
I just am saying, much as the disabled people who work at Goodwill are saying, that they deserve to be paid more.
Why don't you agree?
You can call me by someone else's name for some bizarre reason as much as you like, but it doesn't change the fact that you keep arguing with someone who is saying that disabled people should be paid more at Goodwill, which disabled people also think.
Again, why don't you?
Nothing you will say will change the fact that you are disagreeing with someone who thinks disabled people who work at Goodwill, much like those disabled people themselves, deserved to be paid more.
Why don't you think they deserve to be paid more?
And yes, I'm not a champion. I'm a worthless excuse for a person. But that doesn't change the fact that I think that disabled people at Goodwill deserve to be paid more.
And I still don't get this Richard thing.
Nothing apart from every single comment I have made.
And the Richard thing still makes no sense no matter how many times you do it.
However, you are now harassing me and I am going to flag you for it. Stop harassing me.
Stop harassing me.