Funny

6894 readers

378 users here now

General rules:

Be kind.
All posts must make an attempt to be funny.
Obey the general sh.itjust.works instance rules.
No politics or political figures. There are plenty of other politics communities to choose from.
Don't post anything grotesque or potentially illegal. Examples include pornography, gore, animal cruelty, inappropriate jokes involving kids, etc.

Exceptions may be made at the discretion of the mods.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

TheDude@sh.itjust.works

kersploosh@sh.itjust.works

example@reddthat.com

VicksVaporBBQrub@sh.itjust.works

856

You can feel how cathartic this must have been for someone (lemmy.world)

submitted 4 months ago by The_Picard_Maneuver@lemmy.world to c/funny@sh.itjust.works

124 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It is phonetically how it works.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 1 points 4 months ago

No it isn't. The letters "gh" doesn't make the "f" sound without the full "ough", you can't just take some of the letters out. Same with the "ti" in "tion". In addition, words trace their pronunciation from their origin. Words ending in "tion" are latin-derived, and shares an origion with "sion" (Mission, passion) and cion (suspicion). The reason that "ough" sometimes has an "f" sound is that originally it had a glottal stop, like the word "loch" in Scottish, but over time that glottal stop slipped and became an "f".

The point is, while certain letter sequences have surprising pronunciations in English, you can't just take those weird pronunciations out of context and create a new word. And you certainly can't say that "ghoti" is pronounced "fish".