UK Politics

3089 readers

82 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

tom@feddit.uk

GreatAlbatross@feddit.uk

flamingos@feddit.uk

Reform UK under pressure to prove all its candidates were real people (www.theguardian.com)

submitted 4 months ago by Emperor@feddit.uk to c/uk_politics@feddit.uk

28 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Reform UK has come under pressure to provide evidence its candidates at the general election were all real people after doubts were raised about a series of hopefuls who stood without providing any photos, biographies or contact details.

Reform insists every one of its 609 candidates on 4 July were real, while accepting that some were in effect “paper candidates” who did no campaigning, and were there simply to help increase the party’s vote share.

However, after seeing details about the apparently complete lack of information about some candidates, who the Guardian is not naming, the Liberal Democrats called on Reform to provide details about them.

A Liberal Democrat source said: “This doesn’t sound right and Reform should come clean with evidence. We need Reform to show who they are. People need to have faith in the democratic process.”

A series of candidates listed on the Nigel Farage-led party’s election website only show their name and the constituency they stood in, without any information about them, or contact details beyond a generic regional email address.

Many of these people have no visible online presence, and did not appear to do any campaigning. Photographs of the electoral counts for some of the relevant constituencies show that the Reform candidate was the only person not to attend.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Jackthelad@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You need to have people to nominate the candidate, the papers also need to be handed in by either the election agent or the candidate themselves. There would need to be an awful lot of people in on it for this to even work.

The person in question who is pictured has been interviewed anyway: https://www.gbnews.com/politics/reform-uk-candidate-hits-back-trolling-ai-bot (I know it's GB News, but it shows him on camera).

[–] then_three_more@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

They also had to russle up a lot of candidates and hope to hell that no dirt was dragged up about them because there wasn't time to vet them.

You need to have people to nominate the candidate

10 per candidate. However, they could easily have just been given the name and told that's who they were nominating.

to be handed in by either the election agent or the candidate themselves.

Unlike voting don't need to present ID to be a candidate. So a couple of people could have made their way around presenting papers.