this post was submitted on 14 Jul 2024
485 points (96.7% liked)

linuxmemes

21210 readers
85 users here now

Hint: :q!


Sister communities:


Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
  • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
  • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

  • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
     
    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [–] UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world 19 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Java is still significantly faster and more efficient than Python tho - because it has ahead-of-time optimizations and is not executing plain text.

    [–] Ptsf@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

    Idk numpy go brrrrrrrrrr. I think it's more just the right tool for the right job. Most languages have areas they excel at, and areas where they're weaker, siloing yourself into one and thinking it's faster for every implementation seems short sighted.

    [–] UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

    At it's heart, numpy is C tho. That's exactly what I'm talking about. Python is amazing glue code. It makes this fast code more useful by wrapping it in simple(r) scripts and classes.

    [–] MeanEYE@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Faster, sure. Efficient, fuck no. With Java you have to run around and write ton of boiler plate code to do something simplest in nature.

    [–] deathmetal27@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

    Could say the same for C/C++.

    But yeah I'd like it if the features given by Lombok were standard in the language though it's not a big deal these days since adding Lombok support is very trivial.

    [–] tyler@programming.dev 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

    You shouldn’t use Lombok, as it uses non-public internal Java APIs, which is why it breaks every release. At one point we had a bug with Lombok that only resolved if you restarted the application. Switching off of Lombok resolved the issue.

    Just switch to kotlin. You can even just use Kotlin as a library if you really want (just for POJOs), but at this point Kotlin is just better than Java in almost every way.

    [–] deathmetal27@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

    I agree but I have tried like hell to get my team to use Kotlin but it's hard to convince upper management. The team is reluctant to switch as well.

    Using Lombok is the next best thing.

    Though for POJOs that are immutable you can use record classes now.

    [–] UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

    I'm mainly talking efficiency in terms of energy use. I won't deny that some ugly decisions have been made with Java :D

    [–] MeanEYE@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago (1 children)

    Energy use? That's a pointless metric. If that is the goal then whole idea of desktop should be scraped. Waste of memory and hard drive space. Just imagine the amount of energy wasted on booting GUI.

    [–] UnfortunateShort@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

    Have you ever heard of datacenters, portable devices or climate change?

    [–] MeanEYE@lemmy.world 0 points 3 months ago

    If you want to talk about climate change then electronics is the wrong place to point the finger at. For start look at cement manufacturing. It requires huge amounts of energy to produce even though we have eco-friendly variants ready to go. And cement production amounts to 8% of all greenhouse gasses released annually.

    Hell, just ban private jets and you've offset all of the bad things datacenters ever made. Elon had 10 minute flight to avoid traffic which consumed around 300l of fuel. Royal family makes so many flights a year that you could go into the wild and eat bark until the rest of your life and you wouldn't be able to offset their footprint in thousands of lives.

    Bill Gates himself talks a lot about reducing carbon footprint we make and yet he refuses to sell his collection of airplanes. He has A COLLECTION of them.

    Using higher level language that requires more operations than assembler is not a thing to worry about when talking about climate change. Especially without taking into account how much pollution have those managed to reduce by smartly controlling irrigation and other processes.

    [–] calcopiritus@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

    Python is the slowest (widely used) language there is. It's not hard to be faster.