this post was submitted on 16 Jul 2024
41 points (72.5% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7213 readers
434 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Nice to know genocide isn't the red line for some people.

[–] FartsWithAnAccent@fedia.io 0 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

You are completely (and very possibly intentionally) missing the point. Either way, I have no interest in continuing this conversation so byeeeeee!

[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago
[–] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago

When the options are less genocide and more genocide, you're ok with not standing against the more genocide candidate and letting them win.

Seems like genocide isn't as big of a red line as you say it is if you don't care to lessen it.