this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2024
-17 points (31.1% liked)

Conservative

479 readers
574 users here now

A place to discuss pro-conservative stuff

  1. Be excellent to each other. Civility, No Racism, No Bigotry, No Slurs, No calls to violences, No namecalling, All that good stuff, follow lemm.ee's rules, follow the rules of your instance, etc.

  2. We are a Pro-Conservative forum. Posts must have a clear pro-conservative, or anti left-wing bias. We are interested in promoting conservatism and discussing things that might get ignored elsewhere. All sources are acceptable, however reputable sources with a reputation for factual reporting are preferred.

  3. Dissent is allowed in the comments, but try to be constructive; if you do not agree, then provide a reason which is backed up by references or a reasonable alternative interpretation of the provided facts. That means the left wing is welcome to state their opinions, but please keep it in good faith.

A polite request, not a rule, if you feel the need to report a comment, please don't reply to it.

founded 1 year ago
-17
Bud Light falls to No. 3 beer brand more than year after Dylan Mulvaney controversy (www.foxbusiness.com)
submitted 7 months ago by wintermute_oregon@lemm.ee to c/conservative@lemm.ee
15 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] BearOfaTime@lemm.ee -2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

This wasn't a boycott.

Bud told their primary consumers they didn't want Bud Light associated with them.

So their primary consumers went elsewhere.

Why challenge your customers to like you, especially when your beer sucks so bad.

When people straight up tell me that they don't like me, I don't associate with them if at all possible.

Are you seriously arguing those consumers must continue to purchase bud after they were told to fuck off?

Sounds like fascism to me.