Botany

417 readers

1 users here now

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

Sal@mander.xyz

167

Hundreds of racist plant names will change after historic vote by botanists (www.nature.com)

submitted 3 months ago by neme@lemm.ee to c/botany@mander.xyz

17 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Americans somehow handle "Nigeria". These plants were named before the word became offensive. We shouldn't be putting scientific nomenclature on the euphemism treadmill, IMO.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

And what would be different if we changed it?

Right, nothing.

Science is and always has been about updating information. That is what differentiates it from say religion, which stays in the exact same spot no matter what. Let's not be like religion.

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 months ago

Once you get on the euphemism treadmill, you're going to have a hard time getting off. They're already talking about making more changes:

A second change to the rules for naming plants that aimed to address problematic names, such as those recognizing people who profited from the transatlantic slave trade, also passed — albeit in a watered-down form

IMO the only hard line, and the one that should have been drawn, is that scientific names are only changed due to new discoveries in cladistics. Following wherever the winds of popular culture happen to blow isn't "updating information" in a positive sense.