Linux

48002 readers

912 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

nooter692@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

108

Sell us on your favorite exotic/niche distro (discuss.online)

submitted 3 months ago by bsergay@discuss.online to c/linux@lemmy.ml

108 comments fedilink hide all child comments

The Linux ecosystem is vast and diverse, offering a multitude of distributions to suit every need and preference. With hundreds of distros to choose from, it's a pity that most are rarely mentioned while the popular ones are constantly being regurgitated.

This thread aims to celebrate this diversity and shine a light on smaller projects with passionate developers. I invite you to pitch your favorite underappreciated distro and share your experiences with those lesser-known Linux distributions that deserve more attention.

While there are no strict rules or banlists, I encourage you to focus on truly niche or exotic distributions rather than the more commonly discussed ones. Consider touching upon what makes your chosen distro unique:

What features or philosophies set it apart?
Why do you favor it over other distros, including the popular ones? (Beyond "It just works.")
In what situations would you recommend it to others?

Whether it's a specialized distro for a particular use case or a general-purpose OS with a unique twist, let's explore the road less traveled in the Linux landscape. Your insights could introduce fellow enthusiasts to their next favorite distribution!

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 16 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Not niche, but surely exotic: NixOS, a distribution that is configured via a purely functional language. There is no such thing as installing or uninstalling packages, you add or remove things from your configuration and then simply apply that configuration.

[–] canadaduane@lemmy.ca 9 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I really wanted to like NixOS (and I do, theoretically), but I couldn't dedicate more than 5 full days over Christmas to learn how to get to a working development system.

[–] Laser@feddit.org 4 points 3 months ago (2 children)

May I ask what the issue actually was? Was it about "working system" or about "working development system"?

I don't recall needing more than two days for getting a system up and running for the first time, and in fact it worked so well that I switched all my machines to it by now; granted, I have changed a lot about the configuration ever since and there seem to be a lot of paths to take in the beginning and it's not always clear which one to take. But getting a working system, even one suited for development (personally, I'd recommend a nix development shell for that), shouldn't really take that long.

[–] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago

For me, the main blocker was just getting my head around the concept of it, as it seems like such a wild idea for a distro. I still don't think I'm 100% there, but I have enough down now to cobble a working system together at least.

[–] canadaduane@lemmy.ca 1 points 3 months ago

Working development system. I got quite far, but after so much work, became very frustrated when a VSCode plugin wouldn't work properly because it needed (and assumed) read/write access. I didn't want to have to manage and think about every little plugin I experimented with at the OS level.

[–] governorkeagan@lemdro.id 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I couldn’t even get the installer to work. Tried a couple times but it just wouldn’t install so I gave up on it - still want to try it though

[–] iopq@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

You can manually install it

[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 months ago (2 children)

It's very good for servers. I wouldn't use it on desktop.

[–] Laser@feddit.org 3 points 3 months ago

Using it on all my machines (desktop and notebooks), can't really complain – but then again, couldn't really complain about Arch either

[–] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 3 points 3 months ago

I think it could be good for something like an office, where it might be beneficial to have everyone on an identical setup that's immutable so they can't mess with it, and can (presumably) be duplicated by just copying a config file.

I assume the con would be that if something breaks in an update, it probably breaks for everyone. But by the same token, the solution should fix it for everyone too.