this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2024
366 points (97.4% liked)

News

22869 readers
4136 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Democratic lawmakers hailed President Joe Biden’s historic decision on Sunday not to seek reelection, praising him as putting his country and his party before himself. Republicans called on him to resign from office, saying that if he could not run for another term, office, then he’s unable to serve as president.

Biden’s announcement came after more than two weeks of Democrats urging him to withdraw from the race. Nearly three dozen lawmakers had publicly called on him to end his reelection bid. Others had voiced concerns privately about what the ramifications would be for down-ballot Democrats if he remained in the race. When the president heeded those concerns, Democrats called it a selfless move.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] solrize@lemmy.world 24 points 1 month ago (5 children)

If he had resigned that would have put in Harris as the incumbent and given her a big boost. Do they really want that?

[–] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 45 points 1 month ago

They're flinging bad faith criticisms at the wall and seeing what sticks, they haven't thought that far ahead

[–] superkret@feddit.org 12 points 1 month ago

They are currently in the position to force through their pick of a VP.

[–] ganksy@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

It would give them time to pin a bunch of shit on her and to keep her off the campaign trail.

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

As a leftist, I would prefer this and think it would give her a boost as well. And it would also invalidate the right's new mission to keep Biden on ballots.

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I saw this idea posed here recently and someone pointed out that this would put Mike Johnson as first in line for the presidency behind Harris, which isn't a good idea especially considering recent events.

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Until she nominates a VP. It isn't like Johnson would become VP, that isn't how it works.

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And that nominee is going to be approved by the Republican controlled House a few months before the election? Do you not remember what happened when Obama tried to appoint a Supreme Court justice an entire year before he left office?

[–] apfelwoiSchoppen@lemmy.world -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So you'd rather have them fuck with who's on ballots. Ok.

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Who, Republicans? They have no power over the DNC's nominee nor are either party even required to have a primary. The DNC convention to choose a nominee isn't even until next month so who's fucking with the ballots?

[–] Pandemanium@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

I just looked it up. Normally the DNC can pick any VP candidate and run them. IF, however, there is a vacancy in the Whitehouse (if Biden steps down, Kamala does not have an elected VP) THEN Congress does have to approve the VP nominee. So yeah, do NOT let Biden resign the presidency. That would be a disaster.