this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2024
43 points (100.0% liked)

UK Politics

3089 readers
130 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Jaccident@lemm.ee 13 points 3 months ago (2 children)

No, we don’t. We have a trickle of illegal immigrants and until this month a batshit plan to fly the ones that got caught to Rwanda if they tried to claim asylum.

[–] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Wait, all illegal immigrants would be sent to Rwanda, or just the Rwandans? Seems like that plan would give them a great reason to "lose" their passport.

[–] gedhrel@lemmy.world 13 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The plan rather blurred "illegal immigrant" and "legitimate asylum seeker".

[–] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, we've had some of that over here too.

[–] gedhrel@lemmy.world 11 points 3 months ago

The government plan was struck down by the high courts here because Rwanda was not a suitable destination according to the ECHR.

The (previous) government's response was (a) to pass a law declaring that it was a safe destination; (b) to look to limit the ability of the courts to rule on the legality of government policy.

They really were unconscionably unpleasant fuckers.

[–] Jaccident@lemm.ee 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

All. A truly barbaric proposal.

The humans they traded like political chips should all get to go to Braverman’s house and piss on her doormat.

[–] clay_pidgin@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago

That's awful.

Here in this side, we have the governors of Texas and Florida spending millions in public money to fly and bus asylum seekers and undocumented immigrants to more liberal cities/states to cause a burden there. Primarily they do this as a political cudgel, petty punishment for Democrats recommending leniency in some circumstances.

The people being trafficked are sent thousands of miles away from the courts in which their cases are to be held, which all but guarantees that they will fail to show up and will face further punishment.

It's inhumane.

[–] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, that's... that's a concentration camp with extra steps.

[–] Emperor@feddit.uk 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

We British invented concentration camps while in Africa and no laws about not being terrible to people will stop us doing it again, as long as Tory donors get their cut.