this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2024
718 points (99.2% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

53779 readers
567 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-FiLiberapay


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

One day many years ago I had too many drinks and being stupid and naive and I bought adobe cs5. I still use it on the same computer I installed it a decade ago. Activated and installed only once. Today they revoked the access to it. Clicking the link they say "revoked because purchased from an untrustworthy reseller"

Yeah... untrustworthy reseller, look at the invoice and see who sold&shipped that physical copy...

sold by adobe themselves

Contacted support, they said that they won't do anything about it because it's EOL.

Moral of the story: don't do like me. If buying isn’t owning, piracy isn’t stealing. Never give your money to Adobe.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] atro_city@fedia.io 82 points 1 month ago (2 children)

This is what drives people to piracy. Then they whine about how pirates cost them money.

[–] VieuxQueb@lemmy.ca 42 points 1 month ago (3 children)

What's fumny to me is I remember watching a computer show on TV in late 90s they where interviewing an Adobe representative about the new Photoshop 5.0...

The TV host asked what adobe though about pirated copies and the representative said on LIVE TV that Photoshop price was for professional who make a living out of Photoshop and that any hobbyist had nothing to fear about using a pirated copy as it only served to get more people knowledgable about Photoshop and if these started doing business in photography and neede Photoshop they would then pay for it so to not be unprofessional.

[–] Sir_Kevin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 20 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I remember this as well. Their whole stance was that they'd get everyone using Photoshop even if people had to pirate it. That's part of how it became the industry standard.

[–] EarthShipTechIntern@lemm.ee 8 points 1 month ago

Metallica vs. Napster

Same story, retold by adobe

[–] atro_city@fedia.io 9 points 1 month ago

Probably weren't public by then.

[–] zod000@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

Microsoft low key had the same stance back in the late 80s to mid 90s and it definitely helped cement their dominance.

[–] lord_ryvan@ttrpg.network 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

They didn't whine about it even once here. They whined about their own untrustworthiness, which I can't argue with.