this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2024
362 points (96.9% liked)

YUROP

1139 readers
91 users here now

A laid back community for good news, pictures and general discussions among people living in Europe.

Other European communities

Other casual communities:

Language communities

Cities

Countries

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] JohnnyEnzyme@lemm.ee -2 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Seriously.

Now I'm no scholar, but categorising English as part of the Celtic-branch is just ridoinkulous to me. Like-- that might have been true since before the Roman conquest, but Modern English is easily a West-Germanic branch, overlaid with Norman French, starting in 1066.

[–] Servais@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 1 month ago (6 children)

It's not so much about classification than finding a place to identify it using a suite of yes/no branches based on specific graphems.

German and Dutch are very close languages, but in complete different places in this tree.

[–] JohnnyEnzyme@lemm.ee -4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (5 children)

German and Dutch are very close languages, but in complete different places in this tree.

So maybe we could use a better platform for understanding? (hence my original point?)

(Modern German and Dutch are both from the West-Germanic tree, last I checked)

specific graphems

Okay, fine, granted-- but how does that actually help anyone in this day & age learn about these languages?

AS IN-- dude, we don't need to carry a master's degree in order to understand how English formed out of Anglo-Saxon, with Norman French overlaid on top, now do we?

EDIT: Oh rabbits, no, it's ME whose wrong. Whups..

[–] Eiim@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I still don't think you understand the point of the graphic. It's called "What European language am I reading?", not "how are these European languages related?"

[–] JohnnyEnzyme@lemm.ee 2 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

Oof. I think you're right (2wks later, dangit!), Eiim.
Sorry about that. :S

@Servais@discuss.tchncs.de @discuss.tchncs.de, that was rude of me, and I apologise.

FWIW, I've posted a general apology in our sub's general update if you care to look. Sorry again.

@Comment105@lemm.ee,

I’d personally attack you with something far worse than a silly goose. If I was on my reddit account!

Hmm, what do you think about rabbits instead of geese..?

[–] Servais@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 weeks ago

No worries, thank you for coming back to this comment, even later!

Have a good one!

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)