this post was submitted on 01 May 2024
30 points (80.0% liked)

MapPorn

3131 readers
1 users here now

Discover Cartographic Marvels and Navigate New Worlds!

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Linus_Torvalds@lemmy.world 13 points 5 months ago
  • No (scientific) sources, just advertisements for an Instagram account.
  • No info on underlaying map data (OSM? ...)
  • What even is "Low/Medium/High Risk" in numbers? The lack of quantification is meh.
[–] RunawayFixer@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

So many earthquake zones stop at national borders. From Romanian + Moldavian high risk to very low just by crossing the border into Ukraine. And a similar situation on the nw border of Germany near the low countries and in central Europe. What a nonsense map.

And this map is made even worse, because there exist readily available maps which do contain more accurate information, for example: https://www.epos-eu.org/communication/news/new-european-earthquake-risk-map-and-updated-earthquake-hazard-map-are-available

[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

What’s with that little edge of Turkey being very low risk while the rest of the country is higher?

[–] moistclump@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago

Idk but I’m guessing something about techtonic plates and.. fault lines.

[–] 13esq@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

What constitutes high risk? A magnitude 8 or more once per year?