this post was submitted on 20 May 2024
109 points (98.2% liked)

News

23300 readers
4360 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
rjc@lemmy.world
Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world
dezmd@lemmy.world
Tenthrow@lemmy.world
JonsJava@lemmy.world
gedaliyah@lemmy.world
Blackbeard@lemmy.world
little_cow@lemmy.world
jeffw@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
109
Zombie 2nd mortgages are coming to life, threatening thousands of Americans' homes (www.npr.org)
submitted 6 months ago by jeffw@lemmy.world to c/news@lemmy.world
13 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 68 points 6 months ago (1 children)

What a bunch of fucking crooks. My god.

"An investor deserves to make their money back," Gordon said. "And there is real money at stake."

"I'm looking at some of these bonds that were traded that we helped create. And that's when I had the aha moment," Gordon said. "There's a great opportunity to have a good business."

The business is to buy these bundles of mortgages for sometimes pennies on the dollar. Some of them were worthless. The people who borrowed the money would never pay it back. But other mortgages might be worth something. And for the second mortgages, that was particularly true if you were willing to wait.

They don't even factor in the people, the humans living in these homes and how it may affect their lives. For them it's all business and money. God I fucking hate business people.

[–] nehal3m@sh.itjust.works 71 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Also:

“An investor deserves to make their money back,” Gordon said.

No they fucking don’t, the whole point of that system is to let investors take on the risk to force them to make a decision on what investments are most likely to yield results.

[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 17 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Exactly. It's a fucking gamble.

[–] TrueStoryBob@lemmy.world 8 points 6 months ago

You want a nearly risk free investment, I suggest a high interest bank deposit. No one "deserves" a return on mass mortgage speculation.

[–] Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world 39 points 6 months ago

Jeez. Can we just bring out the guillotines already?

[–] TheOneWithTheHair@lemmy.world 28 points 6 months ago

The best part of the article (if you can call it that) is that it gives you potential information

"Regulation Z, which is part of the Truth in Lending Act," Kelly said. "It requires that monthly statements be sent if there is interest assessed on a mortgage."

So if they did not send monthly statements, it throws the homeowner a potential lifeline.

By violating Regulation Z, Kelly says, "they then open themselves up to serious legal consequences and provide consumers the leverage they need to stay in their homes."

This is just one strategy, but Kelly has been using this approach to help homeowners in dozens of cases. She just resolved a class action case where she was able to get the names of nearly 300 homeowners from one company and help them all.

[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 27 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Damn, this should be illegal. Normal foreclosures are bad enough but usually people at least know they are coming to some extent.

[–] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 2 points 6 months ago

The fact people didn't know this was coming and it was accruing interest seems to be the one thing that saved this lady.

[–] JovialMicrobial@lemm.ee 27 points 6 months ago

I really hate that our system rewards horrible people like this with money.

[–] venusaur@lemmy.world 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I’m confused. How did these people own their homes if they had a second mortgage owed?

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 15 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Back in the day, if a borrower didn't have a 20% down payment banks would issue the first loan for 80% of the value, along with a second, shorter length loan for the difference between a 20% down payment and whatever the borrower could come up with for a down payment. It seems absurd, but in retrospect it was all part of the subprime lending push to write as many loans as possible, and sell them off. Two loans = twice the money!

Then, when the rug got pulled out of the lending market in 2008 there were a lot of programs to consolidate (and even forgive) loans for people with predatory loans on homes they lived in. It sounds like these people were told over the phone their smaller loan was "taken care of", which could mean many things. It could mean the loan was forgiven outright, or that the loan was rolled into a refinanced larger loan (which now had enough equity to avoid PMI, saving the homeowner money without actually forgiving any balances), or simply that the loan was deemed paused for some number of years. So, they continued to pay the first mortgage, while the second one was in some sort of limbo. Clearly the lender did something to it, since the homeowner received no statements, but it didn't go away entirely like the homeowner was led to believe.

I don't mean to shift blame here: clearly, their original lender didn't process that paperwork properly, and ended up selling the original second loan to a shady company that deceptively hid the loan to make it seem like it was in default, while the homeowner had no legitimate way of knowing it was still there. But what we should learn from all this is that nothing is ever official until you receive it in writing. If those homeowners had received and kept any documentation their loan modification, that showed the actual status of that second loan, it would be a lot easier to tell that shady lender to go pound sand. And whenever anyone from a bank tells you absurdly good news, ask for a followup letter and keep it forever.

[–] IamSparticles@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 months ago

Good summary. A lot of this was covered in the story but you have to read through a lot of fluff before you get to the bit about the actual mechanics of the situation. Another bit to mention, though, is that a lot of those 20% second mortgages had variable interest rates, and after the 2008 crash, the rates skyrocketed for a lot of folks. People were unable to make the suddenly much higher payments, which is why they sought consolidation/forgiveness in the first place.

But yeah. Always be aware of what you're signing up for when you take out a loan, and get all the terms in writing. If someone tells you not to worry about making payments, make sure you get that in writing, too. I was lucky enough to learn this lesson a long time ago with a much less expensive asset. My wife and I bought an appliance on one of those no-money-down 0% interest financing deals. The fine print was that if you were late on a single payment by even a day, they immediately tacked on back interest for the full purchase price at ridiculously high rate. My wife thought she had mailed the final payment but it turned out she had miscalculated by one. We got a phone call the day after the last payment was due. On a balance of something like $50, we suddenly had a penalty of over $1000. I was pretty pissed but there wasn't really anything we could do since we'd signed the deal.

[–] Evilcoleslaw@lemmy.world 3 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

It's another aspect of the whole industry being a mess. Loans sold on and on multiple times with the necessary paperwork lost in the shuffle. I remember hearing a few homeowners saved from foreclosure because the company that purchased their mortgage having none of the necessary paperwork.