I've known his stance on the topic, but it's still amazing to hear someone with his background stating that.

David Grusch had originally been scheduled for this event, but I'm happy that Knell spoke in his place. I'm also glad that he listed off other names that have spoken out on NHI and UAP. At this point it feels like an open secret in government and the military that just needs a little more push to get officially addressed.

That stood out to me too. Given Nell’s roles over the years, it’s likely he’d have more access and potentially direct access to some of the programs previously mentioned by David Grusch. If that is the case, then he may be limited in what he can publicly discuss.

I’d definitely like to know what convinced him and what drives him to push for disclosure. Though, I can understand side stepping the question for this event. Today’s discussion didn’t seem to be geared to expanding on what’s currently out there for information on UAP and NHI. Rather, it was likely aimed at bringing the topic to a new audience.

Hopefully we hear more from Nell and others soon, along with more info to solidify their claims.

Gallaudet brings a much needed additional perspective to the discussion. We have Grusch speaking of special access programs with recovered UAP, Fravor and Graves speaking of military and commercial pilot sightings, Schumer and others from Congress with access to military and intel briefings, and Gallaudet with oceanic and atmospheric data. That's just a few of the recent names involved in a push for disclosure. Add in public and individual experiences over the years and it's clear that there is a phenomenon occurring that deserves investigation and answers.

Yeah, I searched last night to see if it was picked up anywhere and didn’t find anything significant. I’d imagine we’ll at least see some opinion articles soon, but I figured some news outlet would have run with this.