this post was submitted on 26 May 2024
116 points (98.3% liked)

Climate - truthful information about climate, related activism and politics.

5194 readers
1092 users here now

Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.

As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades: Graph of temperature as observed with significant warming, and simulated without added greenhouse gases and other anthropogentic changes, which shows no significant warming

How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world: IPCC AR6 Figure 2 - Thee bar charts: first chart: how much each gas has warmed the world. About 1C of total warming. Second chart: about 1.5C of total warming from well-mixed greenhouse gases, offset by 0.4C of cooling from aerosols and negligible influence from changes to solar output, volcanoes, and internal variability. Third chart: about 1.25C of warming from CO2, 0.5C from methane, and a bunch more in small quantities from other gases. About 0.5C of cooling with large error bars from SO2.

Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:

Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
silence7@slrpnk.net
116
New Dutch right-wing coalition to cut research, innovation, and environmental protections (www.science.org)
submitted 5 months ago by veganpizza69@lemmy.world to c/climate@slrpnk.net
7 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/15823220

Four parties hammer out agreement filled with bad news for scientists

The nationalist, populist Party for Freedom, led by Geert Wilders, won 23% of the vote in the November 2023 House elections, putting Wilders—once a fringe figure who proposed a “head rag tax” on women wearing headscarves—close to the center of power. Since then, Wilders has been in contentious and often chaotic negotiations to form a government with three other parties, including the center-right party led by outgoing Prime Minister Mark Rutte, which saw its electoral share shrink to 15%. The governing plan endorsed by the four parties, which marks a crucial step in forming a new government, includes a series of harsh anti-immigration measures. Centrist and left-wing parties fiercely criticized the plan during this week’s debate.

Another sharp turn comes in environmental policy. The Netherlands, a major agricultural exporter, has more farm animals per square kilometer than any other country in Europe, and their waste emits high levels of nitrogen compounds that violate EU rules and harm the country’s ecosystems. Past government plans to tackle the issue have triggered massive protests by farmers and the rise of a new party, the Farmer-Citizen Movement, that won 4.7% of the vote and is part of the new coalition.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] OwlPaste@lemmy.world 24 points 5 months ago

Right wingers going to right wing...

[–] Ooops@kbin.social 17 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

One of the flattest and lowest countries in the world voting to help rising sea levels among other things because right-wing populists cried "blame the evil foreigners" as usual.

If humanity should die out, we at least know it was justified...

[–] neo@lemy.lol 14 points 5 months ago

It would scrap the final two rounds—together worth €6.8 billion—of the National Growth Fund, a 5-year scheme launched in 2021 to boost innovation and economic growth by disbursing a total of €20 billion to consortia of research organizations and companies. The fund’s first three rounds supported dozens of projects, for example to boost the biotech sector, innovate in education, make the steel industry greener, and create a Centre for Animal-Free Biomedical Translation.

The cut is “shocking, because it will hurt the country’s potential for innovation,” says chemist and 2016 Nobel Prize winner Ben Feringa of the University of Groningen, who sits on the fund’s advisory council. “It’s not a very smart strategy if you think about the problems we have to solve as a society.”

The agreement also puts an end to the so-called Sector Plans, a scheme launched in 2023 that spends €200 million annually to reduce academic workloads, provide jobs at universities and academic medical centers, and structure the division of labor between institutes. And the parties agreed to cut €150 million annually from a $500 million fund to advance basic research.

I couldn't have said it better than Mr. Feringa.

[–] Vash63@lemmy.world 14 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Not surprising given the parties in the coalition. Hopefully it doesn't last long...

[–] Shou@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

The problem is, that it will last too long regardless. We're going backwards in progress here.

[–] Veraxus@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

One day is too long.

One minute is too long.

[–] Shou@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Exactly. I couldn't agree more.