333
submitted 2 weeks ago by Blaze@lemmy.zip to c/android@lemdro.id
top 22 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] ChapulinColorado@lemmy.world 92 points 2 weeks ago

This seems similar to the EUs requirements. It really speaks about the US laws when even archaic Japanese legislators (see Japanese copyright laws) are ahead of that market in customer rights/options.

[-] sensiblepuffin@lemmy.world 26 points 2 weeks ago

Has the US ever been ahead of any of its peers when it comes to consumer rights?

[-] pennomi@lemmy.world 30 points 2 weeks ago

No, but it also stands to profit from those violations of consumer rights, where other countries do not.

[-] woelkchen@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

Has the US ever been ahead of any of its peers when it comes to consumer rights?

Fair Use is cool.

[-] henfredemars@infosec.pub 9 points 2 weeks ago

In principle it is cool, but large corporations can still bully you into submission even when it should fall under Fair Use.

[-] rdrunner@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago

Ahhh America. "Yeah we're wrong, but we can afford lawyers for centuries, lol good luck" land of the free

[-] henfredemars@infosec.pub 2 points 2 weeks ago

It’s ridiculous. I think the law should be written with the expectation that the common citizen cannot afford legal counsel for an unlimited period of time.

I am not a lawyer.

[-] chalupapocalypse@lemmy.world 8 points 2 weeks ago
[-] iturnedintoanewt@lemm.ee 5 points 2 weeks ago

How is that ahead? You mean in head count?

[-] sensiblepuffin@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago

That might be the only thing, actually.

[-] sensiblepuffin@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

We're trending in the right direction but we're not at all in a position to be saying we're better than anyone on that front, given how much industry pushback there's been.

[-] nekusoul@lemmy.nekusoul.de 14 points 2 weeks ago

At the very least it's seems heavily inspired by the Digital Markets Act, which is why I'd hope that their wording will be specific enough to close those "loopholes" Apple is currently attempting in the EU.

[-] awesome_lowlander@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Ooh, ooh, do the nintendo switch next!

There's a lot of irony here considering how so many Japanese companies have a track record of pulling this kind of shit themselves.

[-] NorthWestWind@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

The switch is already open source at this point thanks to all the awesome homebrew people

I meant their app store, as per this article

[-] NorthWestWind@lemmy.world 2 points 2 weeks ago

I see. I misunderstood that. Sorry

[-] AI_toothbrush@lemmy.zip 16 points 2 weeks ago

This will forbid "Prevent application developers from using features controlled by the OS with the same level of performance as the one used by Designated Providers."

Which is a huge win if it is enforced.

[-] nekusoul@lemmy.nekusoul.de 6 points 2 weeks ago

It sounds vague and will either end up being a very powerful tool or almost useless. If it's the former, it would be gigantic win indeed.

[-] istanbullu@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 weeks ago
[-] mindbleach@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 weeks ago

Google already was?

[-] umbrella@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 weeks ago
this post was submitted on 13 Jun 2024
333 points (99.1% liked)

Android

16887 readers
95 users here now

The new home of /r/Android on Lemmy and the Fediverse!

Android news, reviews, tips, and discussions about rooting, tutorials, and apps.

🔗Universal Link: !android@lemdro.id


💡Content Philosophy:

Content which benefits the community (news, rumours, and discussions) is generally allowed and is valued over content which benefits only the individual (technical questions, help buying/selling, rants, self-promotion, etc.) which will be removed if it's in violation of the rules.


Support, technical, or app related questions belong in: !askandroid@lemdro.id

For fresh communities, lemmy apps, and instance updates: !lemdroid@lemdro.id

💬Matrix Chat

💬Telegram channels / chats

📰Our communities below


Rules

  1. Stay on topic: All posts should be related to the Android OS or ecosystem.

  2. No support questions, recommendation requests, rants, or bug reports: Posts must benefit the community rather than the individual. Please post to !askandroid@lemdro.id.

  3. Describe images/videos, no memes: Please include a text description when sharing images or videos. Post memes to !androidmemes@lemdro.id.

  4. No self-promotion spam: Active community members can post their apps if they answer any questions in the comments. Please do not post links to your own website, YouTube, blog content, or communities.

  5. No reposts or rehosted content: Share only the original source of an article, unless it's not available in English or requires logging in (like Twitter). Avoid reposting the same topic from other sources.

  6. No editorializing titles: You can add the author or website's name if helpful, but keep article titles unchanged.

  7. No piracy or unverified APKs: Do not share links or direct people to pirated content or unverified APKs, which may contain malicious code.

  8. No unauthorized polls, bots, or giveaways: Do not create polls, use bots, or organize giveaways without first contacting mods for approval.

  9. No offensive or low-effort content: Don't post offensive or unhelpful content. Keep it civil and friendly!

  10. No affiliate links: Posting affiliate links is not allowed.

Quick Links

Our Communities

Lemmy App List

Chat and More


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS