this post was submitted on 17 Jun 2024
351 points (98.3% liked)

Photography

4524 readers
130 users here now

A community to post about photography:

We allow a wide range of topics here including; your own images, technical questions, gear talk, photography blogs etc. Please be respectful and don't spam.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Photographer@lemmy.world
351
I modded a scanner to into a camera, this is 'Eik' (lemmy.world)
submitted 5 months ago by Leavingoldhabits@lemmy.world to c/photography@lemmy.world
35 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The last shot I posted gained some traction, so I felt like sharing some more of what I’ve done with my scanner camera. The scan is done from top to bottom in about 2 minutes, the model did a great job of staying still throughout.

While scanning motion is definitely eye-catching and spectacular, there are other qualities to appreciate. The gorgeous soft, yet tack sharp aesthetic of large format photography is easily available with a scanner.

Usually I fight the IR-super sensitivity of the sensor, but this time it made her skin iridescent against the rock in the background.

top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] callcc@lemmy.world 20 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Nice work! What does the optics look like? Do you have a picture of the whole thing?

[–] Leavingoldhabits@lemmy.world 22 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Thanks!

There’s a picture of the camera in this comment section

Basically it’s an acrylic magnifying glass stuck into a foamboard box held together with gaffers tape. Focus (and FoV by design) is controlled by adjusting the distance between the lens and the scanner surface.

[–] Gordon@lemmy.world 9 points 5 months ago (2 children)

But wait, if the scanner was your camera then how did you take the picture?

[–] SomethingBurger@jlai.lu 3 points 5 months ago

They scanned a mirror.

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

What do you mean how?

Are you asking "how did you press the button"? Or "how does it work"?

[–] Gordon@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

It's a meme (holy crap that was 14 years ago!). Look at the top comment chain.

https://www.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/cmwov/comment/c0tpyls/

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Oh neat! Yup. I knew about that meme. Wild that it's that old now.

[–] Guadin@k.fe.derate.me 7 points 5 months ago

Interested in this as well.

[–] 0xb@lemm.ee 15 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I don't understand what is it you did but I'm glad you did it because this looks amazing

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 6 points 5 months ago

He converted a document scanner into a black and white camera.

[–] Guadin@k.fe.derate.me 11 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

It really gives an "old camera" vibe. It would be fitting if the background was fake, just in the old images. You have an eye for composition as well.

[–] Leavingoldhabits@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Thanks! I dream of someday having enough resources to rent a studio space and construct some proper scenography with experts in the field. It could make for some truly wild landscapes and photos.

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Wait. Fake backgrounds?

[–] Guadin@k.fe.derate.me 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah. In my mind the old (say 18/1900's) photographs are asociated with a fake background. So you see people posing in front of a screen with some scenery. Like this or this

[–] elbarto777@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Thanks! Informative.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 6 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Very intriguing effect. Dreamlike. Does the camera have a viewfinder, or do you just have to experiment to get the framing right?

[–] Leavingoldhabits@lemmy.world 10 points 5 months ago

There’s no viewfinder at the moment. I point the camera to the best of my ability, do a low resolution scan over about 10 seconds, and adjust appropriately. Framing and focus is difficult, but gets easier over time. Whenever I have people helping or modeling on a picture, I make very sure they’re aware that it is a messy trial and error process.

[–] Etterra@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

Looks like it's from a horror movie. Also like she was rolling around in the mud.

[–] lechatron 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That's interesting! I assume you're using some kind of pinhole camera setup that focuses the light on the top of the scanner tray? Would really love to see what the camera looks like!

[–] Leavingoldhabits@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago (2 children)

In basic principle it’s a pinhole camera using a scanner as the photosensitive surface. I’ve stuck a magnifier glass to the front, it gives some sharpness and a lot of possibilities outside of a simple pinhole.

There’s a picture of the camera in my comment history, its violently unimpressive

[–] lechatron 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Pretty much what I expected it to look like! It's really interesting and I bet will make for some fun photos. Basically a very slow horizontal shutter.

[–] Leavingoldhabits@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

You’re spot on, it’s a really slow rolling shutter. I like the idea of focusing in on what is normally considered an undesirable artifact and elevating it to become the centerpiece. Messing around with motion gets some wild results and is a lot of fun!

[–] IMALlama@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

What kind of angle of view do you think you get with this setup? I imagine it would be pretty wide, but could be way off.

[–] Leavingoldhabits@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I’m not really one for numbers, and I don’t know understand your question.

If a 180 degree cone in front of the lens is the widest, I think this setup can do something like 80 degrees, and does its best work between 50 to 70. That said, this purely finger in weather approximation, I’m not really interested in the numbers when I do these shots

[–] IMALlama@lemmy.world 1 points 5 months ago

Thanks! If you happen to also shoot traditional cameras, speaking in terms of say FF EQ focal lengths works too. It does indeed sound pretty wide, with a sweet spot between 24mm and 35mm FF EQ.

[–] Theprogressivist@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Very fucking cool.

[–] itwasawednesday@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I can understand the scan lines, but what causes the "dirt" in the image? Very cool!

[–] Leavingoldhabits@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Thanks! I’m glad you think its cool!

Im afraid the ‘dirt’ is actual dust and grime on the glass plate. It’s a hassle to disassemble and clean, so I don’t do it nearly often enough.

[–] itwasawednesday@lemmy.world 5 points 5 months ago

It adds to it, leave it!

[–] Window_Error_Noises@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago

Yes! Marvelous! I'm so happy to see more of your gorgeous work. I just love it - as a concept, and its results; what a damned cool way to art.

[–] _haha_oh_wow_@sh.itjust.works 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Wild, have you messed with moving it around during exposure?

[–] Leavingoldhabits@lemmy.world 7 points 5 months ago

I haven’t messed with moving the camera around, but I’ve done heaps of experiments with motion in front of the camera.

I do have a dream of doing a sort of anamorphic projection through time, that will require camera motion, but that’s on the cooker for now

[–] hhhyperfocus@lemmy.world 3 points 5 months ago

Very cool. I like the vertical black lines, it looks like a film reel from an old movie that has been scratched going thru the projector.

[–] GlassHalfHopeful@lemmy.ca 1 points 4 months ago

I was wondering if you had done more. Two minutes?! Wow.

[–] feedum_sneedson@lemmy.world -2 points 5 months ago

she cute