General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.
Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.
Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.
If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)
Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.
Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.
!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(
Still voting Labour, but only strategically and with plans to give them hell every chance I get
Labor continues to try and find ways to throw what must be one of the easiest elections in the world. Like seriously, why is Labor so desperate to adopt Tory practices, positions, and controversies when the biggest advantage they have right now in the mind of the average British voter is that they arn’t the Tories?
Because they're quickly becoming two sides of the same coin.
Starmer doesn't care about black people.
So hang on, this is an official labour inquiry which came to the exact conclusion that Diane Abbott was suspended for a year later? It has to be deliberate at this point.
Diane Abbott was suspended for stating non black race did not suffer the same as black.
While I don't disagree with her. Although her wording was politically incompetent.
How is it the same as this report that identified the racism but in no way compare s it to other forms of racism.
Edit: to be clear. Dispite criticism of her here. I have huge respect for Diane Abbott. And when you compare the publics response to some of her mistakes. To that of very similar or identical mistakes from white male politicarians. There is clearly a difference beyond political opinion.
Diane has been attacked on social media and real media for things that fly past when other politicarians make equally bad errors.
The truth is that while what she said was undoubtedly problematic, white male politicians from both sides of the circus have said, and more importantly done, much much worse, and have kept their jobs, and probably even got a pat on the back from the establishment.
The problem isn't that she was suspended, it's that others doing worse aren't - she was 100% suspended because she is a Black woman.
a report that exposed a “hierarchy of racism” within the party
Diane Abbott was suspended:
After she appeared to claim that Irish, Jewish and Traveller people were subjected to differing levels of racism.
Abbott was talking about it in general whereas the report was talking about it specifically within the labour party.
This is the best summary I could come up with:
Labour attempted to gag a prominent Black barrister who authored a report that exposed a “hierarchy of racism” within the party, The Independent can reveal.
The Forde report made 165 recommendations, including the use of blind CVs in recruitment and changes to the complaints procedure, the majority of which the party says it has now implemented.
However, during his interview with Al Jazeera, the barrister claimed that Labour’s lack of debate and engagement over his findings at the time raised wider concerns.
The barrister also told the news outlet that “quite a high proportion of Black and Asian councillors or prospective MPs felt they’d been subjected to disciplinary action which had been deliberately timed to exclude them from qualifying processes or selection”.
Mish Rahman, a member of Labour’s national executive committee (NEC), told The Independent he was disappointed by the letter to Mr Forde.
The leaked documents referred to in this report were made available by Paul Holden, an investigative journalist whose book will be published at the end of the year
The original article contains 1,070 words, the summary contains 172 words. Saved 84%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!
No problem! They can just get Tony Sewell to write the next report