23
!floatingisfun@fedia.io
If you pin and unpin, it should federate the changes.
How does it differ from Codeberg and Forgejo?
I believe a couple Android clients have multi support. Voyager IIRC.
That's a stellar post. Shout-out to you!
Last I checked, the issue is down to different people wanting different things. Some people want instance.tld/multi/community1@instance1.tld1;community2@instance2.tld2;community3@instance3.tld3, others want instance.tld/multi/hash but some people want instance.tld/greedy/topic of which, there's no easy way to do and definitely won't happen, but because they're so vocal, it's just stalled the whole implementation.
But I think that if multi community view is implemented and we can opt communities out of all, it might increase quality, which could be interesting.
Nope, you can find the feature request here https://github.com/LemmyNet/lemmy/issues/818
I'm pretty sure the answer is yes
Summary
According to the video, open source software is not necessarily as important for servers and IT in the modern world as it was in the past. This is because software updates are now delivered electronically over the internet, making it less important to have access to the source code. Additionally, companies typically pay for service agreements with software vendors, which means that the vendor will fix bugs and update the software for them. Even if a company has access to the source code, they may not have the expertise to fix the software themselves.
I believe this is a perfect example of what I believe is called the Dunning-Kruger effect. In the same way that I'm glad amateurs are given a platform, I rue the fact that amateurs are given a platform as a little bit of research would've prevented them making themselves look so stupid. "Servers don't need open source" with 97% of the top 100 servers running Linux looks like an odd position to take. Maybe they're trolling.
view more: next ›
The article went out of its way to not mention Lemmy