this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2024
117 points (96.8% liked)

World News

38639 readers
2480 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 57 points 3 months ago

I wish they would report on this more honestly.

Europe and Australia both back down on mass surveillance in the name of CSAM

FIFY

[–] dactylotheca@suppo.fi 43 points 3 months ago

Not to worry: while the EU may have backed down on the "Chat Control" legislation (again. For now), it's not the only mass surveillance law in the pipeline that's being prepared behind closed doors! The "security by design" proposal – which does the opposite of what the name implies – would get us mass scale surveillance and storing of all our electronic communication and not just images, and would require all encryption used in the EU (by us plebs, that is) to be interceptable.

Like somebody said in an earlier article about Chat Control, we need to fight these fascist proposals infinitely many times, but they only have to succeed once.

[–] lung@lemmy.world 29 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Oh wow, I really didn't expect this, and aside from all the problems with sex trafficking, this is a huge win for privacy... for now

[–] pennomi@lemmy.world 33 points 3 months ago

Privacy is implied when you say “innocent until proven guilty”. Surveillance assumes the opposite.

[–] TheBigBrother@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

I supposed pedos wouldn't storage their CP collections in a smart device anyway unless they are dumb AF..

And if they do they deserve to be processed for being pedos and dumb AF.. LMAO

[–] TastyWheat@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

We actually had this happen at a place I worked at.

Old bloke came in to get his computer looked at since it wasn't working too well. The guys found all kinds of shit on his desktop so they took it out the back and called the cops.

He ended up in jail which is nice.

[–] Lemzlez@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago

I mean that’s the thing - it does happen, but those people are already being caught

And once they catch one, they catch a bunch of others that were part of the whatsapp/telegram/whatever group.

They don’t need these backdoors to catch them, because the ones caught like this are the stupid ones they will catch regardless.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

unless they are dumb AF

The good news is that there is no correlation between high intelligence and pedophilia.