this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2023
115 points (95.3% liked)

science

18077 readers
280 users here now

A community to post scientific articles, news, and civil discussion.

rule #1: be kind

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 53 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] Haui@discuss.tchncs.de 27 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Anticompetitive strategies of other universes.

[–] CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world 23 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Late stage cosmos-capitalism is a bitch

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

The MBAs have redefined Universal Sufferage

[–] Haui@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 years ago

Your username is hilarious! Made me exhale a little faster than usual. :)

[–] jumbodumbo@lemmynsfw.com 19 points 2 years ago (3 children)

The universe isn't small at all actually it's pretty average for its age some would say big even

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

That's just so it doesn't feel bad.

[–] droans@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago

The universe was big enough for the dinosaurs ☹️

[–] Illogicalbit@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago

That’s what she said?

[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago (5 children)

At some point wouldn't gravity override the expansion and cause a contraction again?

[–] DeadNinja@lemmy.world 21 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Last I checked, the "Big Crunch" hypothesis got rejected by scientists.

I am no expert, so can't elaborate any further.

[–] ramble81@lemm.ee 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

That's alright, I wasn't an expert when I asked the question. I was just curious about it.

[–] Plopp@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

I am an expert. But not on this topic so I can't help y'all.

[–] Khavanon 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

The effects of gravity spread at the speed of light. If the sun suddenly blinked out of existence, it would take eight minutes to both see it disappear from Earth and notice a change in our planet's motion. In other words, the planet would continue to orbit that empty space in the middle because the sun's gravity, much like it's light, would still be extending out to us.

The universe is expanding in every part of space all at once. Some places are so far apart that the collective expansion between them is growing at greater distances in a given amount of time than light can travel. And the same can be said for the effects of gravity, but the motion of objects caused by gravity at great distances is far, far slower than the speed of light.

Our galaxy is moving in a direction that is caused partly by something called "The Great Attractor." But even though it's causing us to move, we will never reach it, and it's influence on us will gradually weaken. And it's not even that far away compared to most of what we know is out there.

That being said, this news is interesting.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 10 points 2 years ago

No, the expansion is accelerating.

[–] PM_me_your_vagina_thanks@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If it was gravity causing it, it wouldn't be unusual.

[–] MrPoopbutt@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

If the gravity is behaving as it is currently understood by the scientific community, it would indeed be unusual.

[–] Pottsunami@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Heres a great source

It explains why the universe will have a cold death instead of a heat death.

Right now the universe is expanding and its expanding faster today than yesterday. Things could change, but current math points to a cold death

[–] xanu@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I always interpreted "heat death" as "the death of heat" instead of "a hot death"

[–] Perfide@reddthat.com 8 points 2 years ago

Your interpretation is correct.

[–] Pottsunami@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You are correct and I misremembered it. "The Big Freeze" and "Heat Death" are the same thing. Thats when everything expands until there is no more heat.

If someone knows the correct terms for what I am talking about please let me know. Let me explain further.

What I am talking about is the opposite of heat death, which is somehow in my mind at a hot death? Basically, where everything goes back to one singularity instead of expanding forever.

[–] emeralddawn45@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 years ago

Big crunch is what I've heard it called but I don't know if that's what you're thinking of. Googling that might give you a start though.

[–] Perfide@reddthat.com 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

That IS the heat death of the universe. It's not heat death as in "a wave of heat destroys everything" or anything like that, it's heat death as in "there is no more heat(aka condensed energy), everything is equally cold(aka lack of condensed energy) everywhere. Heat itself is gone, has died".

[–] Pottsunami@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

That is correct and I misremembered. For some reason a heat death makes me think of going back to a singularity because a singularity would probably be the hottest thing ever. Ironically, a heat death would be really cold

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

Its getting older, out of shape. Can't stretch like it used to. To many High Fructose Particles getting pinched in its gravity belt to move that fast.

[–] greavous@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

It's an old man with a beard and a scary need to be worshipped by nutters

[–] MeanEYE@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Sorry guys, I've been a bit constipated lately.

[–] phillaholic@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

New explanation for the Big Bang?

[–] PlushySD@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

Must be The One Above All