this post was submitted on 19 Sep 2023
46 points (96.0% liked)

No Stupid Questions

35810 readers
1773 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Going to hell or not?

all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pikmeir@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Believe it or not, straight to hell.

[–] Alchemy@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

We have the best hangmen in the world because of hell.

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Only very pacifist sects or denominations such as Quakers or Mennonites view most all killing as a sin. Most denominations wouldn't have a problem with it, in a similar vein to just war theory.

[–] roguetrick@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It gets more than just tolerating. As soon as Constantine recognized Christianity, the Council of Arles (314) declared that deserters/those that refused military service on religious grounds even during peace would be excommunicated. The church was always subordinate to the state once they were in accord (or the pope got invaded).

https://www.fourthcentury.com/arles-314-canons/

  1. Concerning those who lay down their weapons in peacetime,[1] be it resolved that they be excluded from fellowship.

It also excommunicated actors and charioteers, which didn't last long considering the hippodrome ended up being more important than the Senate in running Constantinople.

[–] meco03211@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Those witches ain't gonna burn themselves! Though it's possible they didn't consider them "people".

[–] CapeWearingAeroplane@sopuli.xyz 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Just speculating here:

Bak in "Ye Olde Times", it was said that the king was ordained by God, who is infallible. The king must therefore be infallible. As such, the King only selects infallible subordinates. If someone is sentenced to death by one of the kings subordinates (or the king himself), they have been indirectly sentenced by God, through his infallible messengers on earth. Therefore, the hangman is only acting as the "Hand of God", carrying out the judgment indirectly passed by God himself.

Problem solved :)

[–] skulblaka@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

... Therefore, your honor, by virtue of the transitive property I, as a citizen of this fine kingdom, am also infallible and cannot be held accountable for crimes committed by the hand of God.

The defense rests.

No! Not like that!

[–] Roflmasterbigpimp@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

I've actually thought he meant the Game "Hangman" and was wondering why the Church might have an official stance on a simple game ._.

"doing gods work"

[–] SatanicNotMessianic@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

This relates to the Catholic Church. I don’t know about other sects.

It depends on the time and place, but a lot of the time the inquisition would torture someone they accused of heresy (which might be just disagreeing with one particular pope). After extracting the “confession,” the prisoner would be handed over to the king for execution, usually by burning.

They were allowed to inflict horrific tortures for as long as they wanted, lie to the prisoner and even forge confessions, but they drew the line at killing. Sometimes.

[–] addmen@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago
[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure most every youth group and Sunday school plays hangman, so I'm guessing the church wouldn't say no.

[–] son_named_bort@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

The kids might get bored after a few minutes though.

[–] rufus@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thought about using present tense.

[–] rufus@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Sorry. I didn't get it. Thought we were talking about the game hangman...

Talking about real ones... I'm pretty sure most of the religions that have the concept of hell and heaven also love killing in the name of god. Half of the holy books are stories about that. So if you're doing the hanging in the name of the lord, or when ordered by someone affiliated with him: heaven. If you're doing it for someone else or a different god: hell.

But sure. There are several countries with sharia law out there. And countries that are said to be christian also still have the death penalty. This is still an issue.

And Jesus kinda died for my sins anyways. Might as well kill a few people then. To make it worth his effort.

[–] 21Cabbage@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I imagine it depends highly on what church and which hangman, since, at least with an American perspective, churches are scattered across basically any ideology you can think of, and people have been hung for any reason under the sun as well.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's not the hangman's job to determine the reason though, just to carry it out.

[–] 21Cabbage@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 year ago

Well we really get into the weeds with that one, don't we? ISIS had executioners, the United States plenty as well, as did the inquisition. Do we imagine a god which weighed their motives equally?

[–] Telodzrum@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

“The Church” has traditionally referred to the Roman Catholic Church, especially in historical contexts.

[–] JohnDClay@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago

Or the Orthodox Church depending on the location. Those two were more or less conjoined for a while too before the schism.

[–] 21Cabbage@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 year ago

I mean, if we do it that way they're pretty openly against the act and probably consider it a pretty major sin for the active participants but that's less fun than having it be an open ended question.