89
Nationalise the lot, dump in the billions we need to get it back to scratch again.
Infrastructure always makes its money back in growth several times over, before anyone thinks of replying we should spend the money elsewhere
And the amount of effort required to get a refund is ridiculous. Back and forth emails resulting in a cheque in the post 2 months later
………that sounds like an outrageously high number dude
I read it and was like “140 isn’t too bad”. Then I noticed it said per day, wtf?!
~~Every 10th train basically.~~
~~(For people who have a hard time with %...)~~
Edit: should have read the article. It is up 9%, my bad.
If my train costs more than it would to drive, park, and pay congestion charges, there is something very wrong with the system.
This is the outcome of Capitalism . Even the new Open Access Operators are no guarantee of sustainable salvation. As Capitalism in a free market will always seek to acquire and merge. Or out compete and destroy competition.
This isn't capitalism, it's more cronyism where the government takes on all the risk but outsources any profit to private companies
If it were capitalism, the full system would've collapsed over covid where there weren't enough passengers. If it were socialism, it'd probably be largely the same given the number of lines that do lose money, but at least the profitable ones like the London-Birmingham/Manchester routes would be adding money to the government instead of private companies
this post was submitted on 24 Jun 2024
89 points (100.0% liked)
United Kingdom
3910 readers
671 users here now
General community for news/discussion in the UK.
Less serious posts should go in !casualuk@feddit.uk or !andfinally@feddit.uk
More serious politics should go in !uk_politics@feddit.uk.
Try not to spam the same link to multiple feddit.uk communities.
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.
Posts should be related to UK-centric news, and should be either a link to a reputable source, or a text post on this community.
Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.
If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread.
Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.
Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS