23
ICC Orders Arrest of Russian Officials Accused of Directing Attacks on Civilians | Common Dreams (www.commondreams.org)
submitted 4 days ago by DivineChaos100@hexbear.net to c/news@hexbear.net
13 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] nat_turner_overdrive@hexbear.net 22 points 4 days ago

lmao, I had to see what the context is and it's hilarious:

"Pre-Trial Chamber II considered that there are reasonable grounds to believe that the two suspects bear responsibility for missile strikes carried out by the Russian armed forces against the Ukrainian electric infrastructure from at least October 10, 2022 until at least March 9, 2023," the court said. "During this time frame, a large number of strikes against numerous electric power plants and substations were carried out by the Russian armed forces in multiple locations in Ukraine."

They're charging them for targeting electrical infrastructure. Which is target number one for NATO and the IDF, coincidentally, and Ukraine too. thinking-about-it

[-] culpritus@hexbear.net 22 points 4 days ago

Targeting electrical infrastructure in Ukraine:

This is a terrible war crime

Targeting electrical infrastructure in Gaza/Syria/Iraq/Russia/etc

This is justified

[-] Tunnelvision@hexbear.net 11 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

That’s not even something you could realistically charge someone for anyways. It’s completely legal (we’re not talking moral here obviously) to attack infrastructure if it’s being used in a military capacity. And the list of what constitutes “military capacity” is basically a mile long.

Edit: actually I could see Russia using this opportunity to start the conversation of “if Russia doing x is a war crime, then the west is guilty of A-Z”

[-] nat_turner_overdrive@hexbear.net 9 points 4 days ago

I would imagine if this ever actually got into a court there would be a lot of evidence submitted about Ukraine's sustained campaign to try to destroy the ZNPP nuclear plant with artillery and rocketfire

[-] Tunnelvision@hexbear.net 8 points 4 days ago

That’s what I was just thinking too. I don’t know if it would be worth it, but this seems like a good opportunity to start showing clear evidence of western/ Ukrainian war crimes.

[-] Rod_Blagojevic@hexbear.net 11 points 4 days ago

What happens if you use cluster munitions against families relaxing at the beach?

....It's always projection with these people.

[-] Staines@hexbear.net 10 points 4 days ago

Targetting electrical infrastructure is technically a warcrime, and the persistent targeting of the grid in Kharkiv this year with intent to slowly depopulate the city is probably the first real war crime the Russians have been responsible for in the war so far.

ICC have solid jurisdiction because Russians haven't been white since 2022.

[-] 420blazeit69@hexbear.net 9 points 4 days ago

ICC have solid jurisdiction because Russians haven't been white since 2022.

che-laugh

[-] Tunnelvision@hexbear.net 7 points 4 days ago

If Russia can prove the infrastructure was being used in a military capacity it’s not a war crime.

[-] Staines@hexbear.net 2 points 4 days ago

Yep, all of the targeting during the period the ICC cites was mostly to disable the electrically powered rail grid as far as I know.

Kharkiv the past few months would be harder to argue there.

[-] Tunnelvision@hexbear.net 5 points 4 days ago

The rules of what constitutes a military capacity is so large you can basically do whatever you want. If a field commander is using the lights to read a map it’s completely justified to take down the electrical system. Obviously on a moral level it’s fucked to destroy infrastructure like that, but there basically is no legal case here.

this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2024
23 points (100.0% liked)

news

23227 readers
507 users here now

Welcome to c/news! Please read the Hexbear Code of Conduct and remember... we're all comrades here.

Rules:

-- PLEASE KEEP POST TITLES INFORMATIVE --

-- Overly editorialized titles, particularly if they link to opinion pieces, may get your post removed. --

-- All posts must include a link to their source. Screenshots are fine IF you include the link in the post body. --

-- If you are citing a twitter post as news please include not just the twitter.com in your links but also nitter.net (or another Nitter instance). There is also a Firefox extension that can redirect Twitter links to a Nitter instance: https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/libredirect/ or archive them as you would any other reactionary source using e.g. https://archive.today . Twitter screenshots still need to be sourced or they will be removed --

-- Mass tagging comm moderators across multiple posts like a broken markov chain bot will result in a comm ban--

-- Repeated consecutive posting of reactionary sources, fake news, misleading / outdated news, false alarms over ghoul deaths, and/or shitposts will result in a comm ban.--

-- Neglecting to use content warnings or NSFW when dealing with disturbing content will be removed until in compliance. Users who are consecutively reported due to failing to use content warnings or NSFW tags when commenting on or posting disturbing content will result in the user being banned. --

-- Using April 1st as an excuse to post fake headlines, like the resurrection of Kissinger while he is still fortunately dead, will result in the poster being thrown in the gamer gulag and be sentenced to play and beat trashy mobile games like 'Raid: Shadow Legends' in order to be rehabilitated back into general society. --

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
FidelCastro@hexbear.net
Alaskaball@hexbear.net
SeventyTwoTrillion@hexbear.net
ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net
carpoftruth@hexbear.net
GinAndJuche@hexbear.net
Breath_Of_The_Snake@hexbear.net