27
top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Guntrigger@sopuli.xyz 3 points 3 days ago

Are we still talking about "skunk"? I'm pretty sure most of the stuff you find in "regulated" environments like Amsterdam is stronger than anything you'd find in the UK.

[-] autotldr@lemmings.world 3 points 3 days ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Liberal Democrat leader Sir Ed Davey has insisted his support for legalising cannabis is not "inconsistent" with backing a phased smoking ban.

Sir Ed told the BBC he wanted a regulated market for cannabis, arguing that potent forms of the drug and smoking were both "very harmful to people's health".

Taking questions from the public during a BBC Radio 5 Live phone-in, the Lib Dem leader was asked if his support for the smoking ban impacted his stance on the legalisation of cannabis.

The Lib Dem manifesto, which sets out what the party would do if it was elected, pledges to take "'skunk' off the streets by introducing a legal, regulated market for cannabis".

The manifesto also promises to free up police time, reduce court backlogs and tackle prisons overcrowding by diverting people arrested for the possession of drugs for personal use into treatment where appropriate.

Meanwhile, the Green Party manifesto promises a National Commission to agree on an evidence-based approach to reform of drug laws to allow the UK to "move towards a legally regulated market".


The original article contains 628 words, the summary contains 177 words. Saved 72%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2024
27 points (100.0% liked)

UK Politics

2833 readers
337 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS