this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2024
845 points (89.0% liked)

Fuck Subscriptions

3666 readers
1 users here now

Naming and shaming all "recurring spending models" where a one-time fee (or none at all) would be appropriate and logical.

Expect use of strong language.

Follow the basic rules of lemmy.world and common sense, and try to have fun if possible.

No flamewars or attacking other users, unless they're spineless corporate shills.

Note that not all subscriptions are awful. Supporting your favorite ~~camgirl~~ creator or Lemmy server on Patreon is fine. An airbag with subscription is irl Idiocracy-level dystopian bullshit.

New community rule: Shilling for cunty corporations, their subscriptions and other anti-customer practices may result in a 1-day ban. It's so you can think about what it's like when someone can randomly decide what you can and can't use, based on some arbitrary rules. Oh what, you didn't read this fine print? You should read what you're agreeing to.

==========

Some other groovy communities for those who wish to own their products, their data and their life:

Right to Repair/Ownership

Hedges Development

Privacy

Privacy Guides

DeGoogle Yourself

F-Droid

Stallman Was Right

Some other useful links:

FreeMediaHeckYeah

Louis Rossman's YouTube channel

Look at content hosted at Big Tech without most of the nonsense:

Piped

Invidious

Nitter

Teddit

 

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Crampon@lemmy.world 11 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I left Spotify for Tidal. But why would anyone feel obliged for free music from a commercial host? Just self host if you dont want to pay. Piracy is always morally right. It's preservation of cultural heritage.

I choose to pay for Tidal because of convenience. I refuse to pay for more than 2 streaming services. It's fairly easy for any adult to make choices like that.

This is an imagined problem and a fairly new one to.

Left handed people having to use tools and appliances designed for right handed people is an actual bigger issue.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] jol@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 4 months ago (15 children)

I don't get it. They are complaning that their limited free plan is limited?

They're complaining that one of the things the limited free plan takes away is something they were using to accommodate their disability.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] Alchalide@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago (4 children)

I'll take youtube music revanced. Installed more than a year ago, never updated since then. Logged in with Google account and still works fine.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] TheV2@programming.dev 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

So how did deaf people enjoy music for free before Spotify?

[–] fiercekitten@lemm.ee 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Talking about lyrics specifically?; they probably didn't. That's no reason to not make things more accessible to people with disabilities though. It's about quality of life and making sure people with disabilities have equitable access.

If having the lyrics available is an essential part of being able to enjoy the music, it should be as equally accessible as the music is.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HawlSera@lemm.ee 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I never used Spotify, the whole thing seem stupid

[–] _g_be@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Coming from the age of ipods and piracy, Spotify was a great alternative to that and reasonably priced for the usage you could get out of it. These days is harder to justify

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] IsThisAnAI@lemmy.world 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This is just some nerd looking to be angry.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cheddar@programming.dev 6 points 4 months ago (21 children)

Why do they think that they are entitled to free lyrics?

load more comments (21 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›