162
submitted 3 days ago by BrikoX@lemmy.zip to c/globalnews@lemmy.zip

The end of Chevron deference will touch on everything from broadband policy to climate change.

Archived version: https://archive.ph/WNE5v

top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] Veraxus@lemmy.world 48 points 3 days ago

TL;DR; Our country is fucked. SCOTUS just made the unelected, unaccountable, oligarchy of judges the top law of the land, nationwide.

[-] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 28 points 3 days ago

The key point of Chevron was that laws like these are policy decisions, and those policy decisions should be made by the political branches responsive to the voters, Congress and the president, not by unaccountable judges with no constituents. ... (in 1984) The Supreme Court ruled in favor of Chevron, allowing the Ronald Reagan admins industry-friendly EPA to stick with a lax interpretation of the Clean Air Act.

So the 1984 ruling, and now the overturn, are efforts by a corrupt conservative-stacked court to benefit the conservative political and ideological agenda. I always believed that Americans would never do anything about an illegitimate court dismantling democracy and the rule of law, but it's still just as comically dystopian to watch it happen in real time.

[-] heavy@sh.itjust.works 16 points 3 days ago

The scotus is illegitimate

[-] PriorityMotif@lemmy.world 10 points 3 days ago

They just fucked themselves because every pedant is going to come out in force to mess with them.

Under 40 U.S.C. §6102 the Marshal of the Supreme Court may prescribe regulations, approved by the Chief Justice of the United States, that are necessary for the adequate protection of the Supreme Court Building and grounds and of individuals and property in the Building and grounds; and the maintenance of suitable order and decorum within the Building and grounds.

I'll be suing because the rules they have in place state that there are no demonstrations allowed on the grounds, which is a first amendment violation and not necessary. They also state that there are no guns allowed, a second amendment violation. Their job isn't too protect the justices, just the people inside. Justices didn't have to come if they don't feel safe.

[-] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 8 points 3 days ago

the people who profit and benefit from this don't have to worry about living in a barren toxic wasteland, they'll just make their serfs build them a hardened fortress on every mountain summit, away from the stench of the unwashed proles who serve them hand and foot for table scraps

[-] frauddogg@lemmygrad.ml 3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

My reaction to the impressive cavalcade of ignorant fuckshit perpetuated by our "leaders", jackass and fossil alike, again and again over the past twenty years to lead us to this day:

All I got to say is "arm up, learn your tools, and be expensive if you must". 'Law' in Amerika just became illegitimate. If you didn't think you lived in a fascist hellscape before, you might wanna wake up and smell the gunpowder.

this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2024
162 points (99.4% liked)

Interesting Global News

2230 readers
141 users here now

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media postsAvoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS