this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2024
45 points (97.9% liked)

PC Gaming

8505 readers
520 users here now

For PC gaming news and discussion. PCGamingWiki

Rules:

  1. Be Respectful.
  2. No Spam or Porn.
  3. No Advertising.
  4. No Memes.
  5. No Tech Support.
  6. No questions about buying/building computers.
  7. No game suggestions, friend requests, surveys, or begging.
  8. No Let's Plays, streams, highlight reels/montages, random videos or shorts.
  9. No off-topic posts/comments.
  10. Use the original source, no clickbait titles, no duplicates. (Submissions should be from the original source if possible, unless from paywalled or non-english sources. If the title is clickbait or lacks context you may lightly edit the title.)

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] curiousaur@reddthat.com 19 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Upgradable vram would be huge.

[–] PenguinTD@lemmy.ca 2 points 4 months ago

just move to unified vram like console would be best.

[–] Philharmonic3@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

Isn't double-digit nanosecond latency just microsecond latency?

Edit: I have learned thanks to helpful commenters that quadruple digit nanosecond is microseconds

[–] jmfwnsfw@lemmynsfw.com 10 points 4 months ago

Quadruple digit nanosecond latency is microseconds

[–] magiccupcake@lemmy.world 4 points 4 months ago

100 nano seconds is 0.1 micro seconds, so not quite.

I imagine double digit is 99 ns or less