Consciousness theory slammed as ‘pseudoscience’ — sparking uproar (www.nature.com)

submitted 9 months ago by EdenRester@kbin.social to c/news@lemmy.world

3 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Researchers publicly call out theory that they say is not well supported by science, but that gets undue attention.

A letter, signed by 124 scholars and posted online last week1, has caused an uproar in the consciousness research community. It claims that a prominent theory describing what makes someone or something conscious — called the integrated information theory (IIT) — should be labelled “pseudoscience”. Since its publication on 15 September in the preprint repository PsyArXiv, the letter has some researchers arguing over the label and others worried it will increase polarization in a field that has grappled with issues of credibility in the past.

top 3 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[-] geosoco@kbin.social 4 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Here's the psyarxiv link - It's short and worth reading.

It sounds like some of the general issue here is around the language of being "dominant" and "well-established" and that it might be receiving undue attention without more thorough research supporting it. There's also some concern about the testability of some of the claims the theory proposes.

Part of the letter's issue seems to be about sharing results prior to peer-review.

The actual letter doesn't seem to claim it should be labeled pseudoscience, but just mentions that some others have labeled it that:

"IIT is an ambitious theory, but some scientists have labeled it as pseudoscience"

(edit: language clarifications)

[-] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 2 points 9 months ago

I'm trying to figure out what IIT claims that is making people upset. Normally when I think of pseudoscience, it involves metaphysics or magic or psychics or whatever. It sounds like that's not what they're referring to in this context, but I can't figure out what about the theory has people up in arms because I'm struggling to understand what the theory is saying about consciousness. It's all going over my head. Could someone eli5 for me?

[-] EdenRester@kbin.social 3 points 9 months ago

You can read the session "Reception" of the related Wikipedia page : https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integrated_information_theory

this post was submitted on 21 Sep 2023

15 points (89.5% liked)

News

21742 readers

3362 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil

Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.

2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.

Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.

3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.

Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.

4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.

Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.

5. Only recent news is allowed.

Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.

6. All posts must be news articles.

No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.

7. No duplicate posts.

If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.

8. Misinformation is prohibited.

Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.

9. No link shorteners.

The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.

10. Don't copy entire article in your post body

For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

rjc@lemmy.world

Thekingoflorda@lemmy.world

gedaliyah@lemmy.world

Blackbeard@lemmy.world

little_cow@lemmy.world

jeffw@lemmy.world