this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2024
77 points (95.3% liked)

World News

39041 readers
2692 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

JAKARTA, Indonesia (AP) — Years after being felled, vast swathes of Indonesia’s old-growth forests are left sitting idle. And when the land is finally put to use, it’s most often for new palm oil plantations, according to a study published in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

But some experts — including the study’s authors — are hoping for a silver lining: The opportunity for Indonesia to expand its agricultural, palm, pulp and other commodities without having to cut down more trees, thus meeting increasing demand from companies and governments for products that didn’t depend on deforestation.

“There’s maybe some hope that if the country can focus on these idle, non-forest lands ... it could potentially drop deforestation to zero, and still have a lot of opportunities for economic development,” said Diana Parker, a postdoctoral associate in the University of Maryland’s Department of Geographical Sciences and the lead author of the study.

top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NoSpotOfGround@lemmy.world 16 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

"Yes, we've laid waste to your lands, but think of how much we could exploit them (and you, of course) now!"

[–] leds@feddit.dk 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Maybe it is part of the plan? Making a new palm oil plantation on conveniently already bare land instead of having to destroy old growth forest? I can imagine that some customers have sustainability clauses in the contracts saying that they will not buy oil from recently cleared land so the solution is simply to wait a but longer sobitvis no longer recently

[–] Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world 1 points 4 months ago

I thought the soil lacks the nutrients for further use, which is why more and more land gets taken. I could be wrong about this as it is just something I've seen/heard and never looked into.

[–] dan1101@lemm.ee 10 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The Earth can heal if people just leave the land alone for some years. But there are too many people wanting too much money for that to happen.

[–] tb_@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

"Some years" is a bit of an understatement for old growth forests. I still very much agree.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I suppose reforestation would be asking too much...

I'm looking forward to the "they cut down all of the Amazon and are only using 20% of the land, but people are seeing economic opportunities" article.

[–] Stamau123@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago

I bet if they do reforestation I bet it would be some monoculture crap job that may as well have been a palm oil field

[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 1 points 4 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


But some experts — including the study’s authors — are hoping for a silver lining: The opportunity for Indonesia to expand its agricultural, palm, pulp and other commodities without having to cut down more trees, thus meeting increasing demand from companies and governments for products that didn’t depend on deforestation.

“There’s maybe some hope that if the country can focus on these idle, non-forest lands ... it could potentially drop deforestation to zero, and still have a lot of opportunities for economic development,” said Diana Parker, a postdoctoral associate in the University of Maryland’s Department of Geographical Sciences and the lead author of the study.

A vast tropical archipelago stretching across the equator, Indonesia is home to the world’s third-largest rainforest, with a variety of endangered wildlife and plants, including orangutans, elephants and giant forest flowers.

Indonesia also has the world’s largest reserves of nickel — a critical material for electric vehicles, solar panels and other goods needed for the green energy transition.

Since 1950, more than 74 million hectares (285,715 square miles) of Indonesian rainforest — an area twice the size of Germany — have been logged, burned or degraded for development of palm oil, paper and rubber plantations, nickel mining and other commodities, according to Global Forest Watch.

Experts lamented the clearing that has led to idle land, but some wondered if it might wind up being a boon for Indonesia as it contends with governments and companies seeking to eliminate deforestation from commodity supply chains.


The original article contains 629 words, the summary contains 248 words. Saved 61%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!