this post was submitted on 22 Sep 2023
59 points (98.4% liked)

Medicine

1016 readers
1 users here now

This is a community for medical professionals. Please see the Medical Community Hub for other communities.

Official Lemmy community for /r/Medicine.


!medicine@mander.xyz is a virtual lounge for physicians and other medical professionals from around the world to talk about the latest advances, controversies, ask questions of each other, have a laugh, or share a difficult moment.

This is a highly moderated community. Please read the rules carefully before posting or commenting.



Related Communities

See the pinned post in the Medical Community Hub for links and descriptions. link (!medicine@lemmy.world)


Rules

Violations may result in a warning, removal, or ban based on moderator discretion. The rule numbers will correspond to those on /r/Medicine, and where differences are listed where relevant. Please also remember that instance rules for mander.xyz will also apply.

  1. Flairs & Starter Comment: Lemmy does not have user flairs, but you are welcome to highlight your role in the healthcare system, however you feel is appropriate. Please also include a starter comment to explain why the link is of interest to the community and to start the conversation. Link posts without starter comments may be temporarily or permanently removed. (rule is different from /r/Medicine)

  2. No requests for professional advice or general medical information: You may not solicit medical advice or share personal health anecdotes about yourself, family, acquaintances, or celebrities, seek comments on care provided by other clinicians, discuss billing disputes, or otherwise seek a professional opinion from members of the community. General queries about medical conditions, prognosis, drugs, or other medical topics from the lay public are not allowed.

  3. No promotions, advertisements, surveys, or petitions: Surveys (formal or informal) and polls are not allowed on this community. You may not use the community to promote your website, channel, community, or product. Market research is not allowed. Petitions are not allowed. Advertising or spam may result in a permanent ban. Prior permission is required before posting educational material you were involved in making.

  4. Link to high-quality, original research whenever possible: Posts which rely on or reference scientific data (e.g. an announcement about a medical breakthrough) should link to the original research in peer-reviewed medical journals or respectable news sources as judged by the moderators. Avoid login or paywall requirements when possible. Please submit direct links to PDFs as text/self posts with the link in the text. Sensationalized titles, misrepresentation of results, or promotion of blatantly bad science may lead to removal.

  5. Act professionally and decently: /c/medicine is a public forum that represents the medical community and comments should reflect this. Please keep disagreement civil and focused on issues. Trolling, abuse, and insults (either personal or aimed at a specific group) are not allowed. Do not attack other users' flair. Keep offensive language to a minimum and do not use ethnic, sexual, or other slurs. Posts, comments, or private messages violating Reddit's content policy will be removed and reported to site administration.

  6. No personal agendas: Users who primarily post or comment on a single pet issue on this community (as judged by moderators) will be asked to broaden participation or leave. Comments from users who appear on this community only to discuss a specific political topic, medical condition, health care role, or similar single-topic issues will be removed. Comments which deviate from the topic of a thread to interject an unrelated personal opinion (e.g. politics) or steer the conversation to their pet issue will be removed.

  7. Protect patient confidentiality: Posting protected health information may result in an immediate ban. Please anonymize cases and remove any patient-identifiable information. For health information arising from the United States, follow the HIPAA Privacy Rule's De-Identification Standard.

  8. No careers or homework questions: Questions relating to medical school admissions, courses or exams should be asked elsewhere. Links to medical training communitys and a compilation of careers and specialty threads are available on the /r/medicine wiki. Medical career advice may be asked. (rule is different from /r/Medicine)

  9. Throwaway accounts: There are currently no limits on account age or 'karma'. (rule is different from /r/Medicine)

  10. No memes or low-effort posts: Memes, image links (including social media screenshots), images of text, or other low-effort posts or comments are not allowed. Videos require a text post or starter comment that summarizes the video and provides context.

  11. No Covid misinformation, conspiracy theories, or other nonsense

Moderators may act with their judgement beyond the scope of these rules to maintain the quality of the community. If your post doesn't show up shortly after posting, make sure that it meets our posting criteria. If it does, please message a moderator with a link to your post and explanation. You are free to message the moderation team for a second opinion on moderator actions.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 34 points 9 months ago (2 children)

Decades of corporate media telling yuppies that wine was good for them has had lasting consequences.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 10 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I mean, it says what happened right there in the article, and no the problem wasn't "corporate media telling yuppies" anything. In reality, people of lower socioeconomic status are more likely to develop an alcohol use disorder and to suffer serious health consequences from alcohol use, and blaming "yuppies" does a disservice to anyone who needs to hear this message.

One reason for the shift is that researchers now know that there were some procedural flaws in past research, says Dr. Manson. Past studies often compared people who drank alcohol against a mixed group of nondrinkers. Although some of the people in the nondrinking group never drank alcohol, some had stopped drinking because they were recovering from alcohol use disorders and had been heavy drinkers for years before they quit. Others had given up alcohol because of health problems, such as heart disease or diabetes, or because they were taking medications that interacted with alcohol, says Dr. Manson.

"When studies excluded former drinkers and people with underlying health problems, they didn’t show the same alcohol-related cardiovascular benefits," says Dr. Manson.

In addition, the WHF noted that much of the past research on alcohol and heart health consisted of observational studies β€” not the more reliable randomized controlled trials. When randomized trials were conducted, they failed to find a heart benefit from drinking alcohol. Also, some of the most favorable effects of alcohol had been found in studies paid for by the alcohol industry, which raised the potential of bias.

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 23 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

None of what you said really dismisses what I said about affluent credulous people additionally buying into the wondrous health benefits of their developing wine habits.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 0 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

You're trying to take a potshot at wealthy people about a problem that pervades all of humanity, and it's just falling flat. This is a science community, contrived potshots are better suited to your home instance

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 26 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You're doing the equivalent of that "all lives matter" overreaction toward Black Lives Matter. The widdle smol bean wine snobs will be just fine without you being weird and defensive about them.

contrived potshots are better suited to your home instance

You say as you take contrived potshots.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 1 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

You seriously don't realize you're on a science instance. I would definitely support mander defederating from hexbear if this is what y'all have to offer

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 28 points 9 months ago (1 children)

You seriously don't realize you're on a science instance.

You're continuing to wander off topic to be very mad at me.

In a science instance.

Because I mentioned a consequence that did affect a group of people that were exposed to decades of "wine is good for you, actually" junk science on television news.

I would definitely support mander defederating from hexbear if this is what y'all have to offer

And you continue drifting off topic to be very mad at Hexbear. Totally scientifically and on topic.

[–] protist@mander.xyz -1 points 9 months ago (4 children)

You're continuing to wander off topic to be very mad at me

This is not the case, but over time it's become apparent this is what hexbear users do repeatedly: gaslight and troll because they thrive off the perception of "triggering" people. I realize this is not a serious conversation, because you're just going to keep accusing me of doing everything you're doing. I hope you're able to get a good night's sleep tonight and wake up in a better place tomorrow

[–] JuryNullification@hexbear.net 30 points 9 months ago (1 children)

gaslight

β€œGaslighting” is not just a synonym for lying (or saying things you don’t like, for that matter)

[–] GenderIsOpSec@hexbear.net 29 points 9 months ago

smdh and i thought this was a science instance πŸ˜”

[–] Sator_is_Tense@hexbear.net 30 points 9 months ago

over time it's become apparent this is what hexbear users do repeatedly: gaslight and troll because they thrive off the perception of "triggering" people.

tagline

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 25 points 9 months ago

This is not the case

contrived potshots are better suited to your home instance

You seem to be making your own locally sourced contrived potshots and have contributed nothing to this thread so far but those.

but over time it's become apparent this is what hexbear users do repeatedly: gaslight and troll because they thrive off the perception of "triggering" people. I realize this is not a serious conversation, because you're just going to keep accusing me of doing everything you're doing. I hope you're able to get a good night's sleep tonight and wake up in a better place tomorrow

So much science in side of this comment chain so far from you. Are you trying to win a scientific last word game? blob-sleep

[–] krei@hexbear.net 8 points 9 months ago

Lol

This is, as you say, "cope"

[–] pisstoria@hexbear.net 9 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I have more than one relative that have "treated" suspected heart attacks with alcohol. While their reasoning isn't the worst since it interferes with clotting, I'd have a heart attack myself if I tried to convince them that alcohol isn't good for your heart.

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

So have I.

But according to the very nonpolitical and very scientific reply I got further down in this comment chain, I'm blaming yuppies for... being yuppies and buying into junk science. Yes, I did do that. How dare I!

[–] pisstoria@hexbear.net 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I honestly didn't take the yuppies comment very seriously at first, but the statistics on alcohol consumption by income/education reinforce it so hard.

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 4 points 9 months ago (1 children)

So much for the Hexbear hater's very scientific "it's actually about the poors and their booze, actually" euphoria.

[–] pisstoria@hexbear.net 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

The most bizarre thing about that exchange is that they immediately went into talking about addiction when the entire point of the article was that you don't have to be an addict or heavy drinker to harm yourself with alcohol.

[–] UlyssesT@hexbear.net 3 points 9 months ago

That's why I suspected a wine snob with the wine snobby belief that they're special and that their alcohol treat doesn't count. I know that type offline too. yea

[–] JK1348@hexbear.net 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I quit drinking comrades! I have over a year without drinking consistently (I've only broken it 3 times for weddings since Feb of last year) i prefer not drinking now, the hangover is unbearable.

Still love were and psychedelics

I also work out consistently now, I'm very proud I stopped drinking because it's made me a better Marxist.

[–] Binthinkin@kbin.social 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

I quit at 25 drinking all alcohol because the people I was around sucked and decided to do what their parents did and now many years later they look terrible like them too.

I would hate to be 40 and fucked up like so many do. The weed smokers faired so much better. They don’t even have gray hair into their 40’s like the drinkers do thats the biggest thing I noticed.

[–] ThePac@lemmy.ml 1 points 9 months ago
[–] Compactor9679@lemm.ee -2 points 9 months ago

Skipping the jabs :)