this post was submitted on 13 Jul 2024
21 points (95.7% liked)

dailygames

2025 readers
72 users here now

Community for daily games like Wordle, Jumblie, Connections etc.

Post your daily games and scores. Discover new games and discuss with others.

Find games

Share your results

It’s useful to wrap your results in a markdown codeblock to preserve the layout. Put three backticks ``` before and after your result to create a codeblock.

πŸŸ¨πŸŸ¨β¬›β¬›β¬›
πŸŸ¨πŸŸ©β¬›β¬›β¬›
πŸŸ©πŸŸ©πŸŸ¨πŸŸ¨β¬›
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩

Spoilers

Please put possible spoilers in spoiler tags

visible spoiler titlehidden content

Rules

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] WayTooDank@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@Emotional_Series7814@kbin.melroy.org check this out, its exactly what I talked about earlier

Tap for spoilerPurple category is based on single letter phonetics

[–] Emotional_Series7814@kbin.melroy.org 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

spoilerIn that case I wonder what they mean by

Categories will always be more specific than "5-LETTER-WORDS," "NAMES" or "VERBS."

Given that they actively do a thing where they assign one word to several categories, only one of which is in the puzzle, and the others are red herring categories that do not have four entries, they probably should realize that the most obvious category for these three words is "meta-information about the words" and been a lot more clear with their meaning.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 3 points 1 year ago

They obviously think this is more general than those ones they say they won't do.

As another example, we've definitely seen ones that are "homophones" before (I can't remember the specific example, but think: "there", "their", "they're"), and I think we've even seen one as simple as "rhymes", where all 4 words rhymed with each other. Is that more specific than the ones they said they wouldn't do? I dunno. I've never liked that type of category personally, because yeah, it definitely seems pretty unspecific to me.

[–] muntedcrocodile@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Connections
Puzzle #398
🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟨🟨🟨🟨
🟦🟦🟦🟦
πŸŸͺπŸŸͺπŸŸͺπŸŸͺ

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 3 points 1 year ago

Connections
Puzzle #398
🟨🟨🟨🟨
🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟦🟦🟦🟦
πŸŸͺπŸŸͺπŸŸͺπŸŸͺ

[–] nicolairathjen@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago
Connections 
Puzzle #398
🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟦🟦🟦🟦
🟨🟨🟨🟨
πŸŸͺπŸŸͺπŸŸͺπŸŸͺ

[–] lemonmelon@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Connections
Puzzle #398
🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟨🟨🟨🟨
πŸŸͺπŸŸͺπŸŸͺπŸŸͺ
🟦🟦🟦🟦

[–] JaumeI@programming.dev 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Connections

Puzzle #398

🟨🟨🟨🟨

🟩🟩🟩🟩

πŸŸͺ🟦🟦🟦

🟦🟦🟦🟦

πŸŸͺπŸŸͺπŸŸͺπŸŸͺ

[–] dropout@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Connections Puzzle #398

🟨🟨🟨🟨

🟦🟦🟦🟦

🟩🟩🟩🟩

πŸŸͺπŸŸͺπŸŸͺπŸŸͺ

[–] rockerface@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Connections Puzzle #398 🟩🟩🟩🟩 🟨🟨🟨🟨 🟦🟦🟦🟦 πŸŸͺπŸŸͺπŸŸͺπŸŸͺ

[–] Pandantic@midwest.social 2 points 1 year ago

This one was easy for me

Connections 
Puzzle #398
🟩🟩🟩🟩
πŸŸͺ🟨🟨πŸŸͺ
🟨🟨🟨🟨
🟦🟦🟦🟦
πŸŸͺπŸŸͺπŸŸͺπŸŸͺ
[–] otter@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago
Connections 
Puzzle #398
🟨🟨🟨🟨
🟩🟩🟩🟩
πŸŸͺπŸŸͺπŸŸͺπŸŸͺ
🟦🟦🟦🟦

The hint in the comments here helped, I was stuck otherwise

[–] esc27@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago
Connections 
Puzzle #398
🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟨🟨🟨🟨
🟦🟦🟦🟦
πŸŸͺπŸŸͺπŸŸͺπŸŸͺ
[–] Hazmatastic@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Connections
Puzzle #398
🟩🟩🟩🟩
🟨🟨🟨🟨
🟦πŸŸͺ🟦🟦
🟦🟦🟦🟦
πŸŸͺπŸŸͺπŸŸͺπŸŸͺ

[–] DatNSFW@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Connections Puzzle #398

🟩🟩🟩🟩

🟦🟦🟦🟦

🟨🟨🟨🟨

πŸŸͺπŸŸͺπŸŸͺπŸŸͺ

[–] Dzlkrns@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 year ago

Connections Puzzle #398 🟩🟩🟩🟩 🟨🟨🟨🟨 🟦🟦🟦🟦 πŸŸͺπŸŸͺπŸŸͺπŸŸͺ