this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2024
407 points (98.8% liked)

People Twitter

7676 readers
1329 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That explains why it was hard for him to talk to women. I wouldn’t be able to focus either.

[–] pruwybn@discuss.tchncs.de 12 points 1 year ago

If you're nervous, just imagine everyone wearing clothes.

Oh, I'd be able to focus alright...

[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Also it’s interesting that NDT orients his EM spectrum by wavelength rather than frequency, such that “above red” and “below UV” falls outside the visible range. Is ascending wavelength the convention in astrophysics?

[–] Little_mouse@lemmy.ca 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I imagine that he is equating the spectrum back to the rainbow, where red is the 'top' of the visible arch when a single rainbow is seen from the ground.

Of course the outer ring from a double rainbow flips the order of the colours, but that's probably being needlessly pedantic.

[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 10 points 1 year ago

Oh shit, I hadn’t thought of that! That would be more accessible to the uninitiated, which is his thing.

[–] cynar@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not normally. In physics the general convention is to use photon energy. This puts Radio and IR 'below' red, and UV 'above'.

[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 4 points 1 year ago

That makes sense. Might’ve just been an accidental swap. Tweets aren’t peer reviewed.

[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wasn’t Data “fully functional” and “anatomically correct?”

[–] Stamets@lemmy.world 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

He straight up fucked Tasha Yar. But Brent didn't lol

[–] Septimaeus@infosec.pub 8 points 1 year ago