this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2024
188 points (99.0% liked)

Europe

1664 readers
735 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in !yurop@lemm.ee. (They're cool, you should subscribe there too!)
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)

(This list may get expanded when necessary.)

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the mods: @federalreverse@feddit.org, @poVoq@slrpnk.net, or @anzo@programming.dev.

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Archived link

The EU’s Consumer Protection Cooperation (CPC) regulators, who began their investigation after complaints from consumer watchdog groups, claim the company uses confusing language to explain how both the paid and “free” versions of Facebook and Instagram work and that its rollout pressured people to make a choice without enough time to consider how it would affect them. They also say that calling the ad-free versions of Facebook and Instagram “free” is misleading since it still requires users to consent to the use of their data for targeted ads.

Didier Reynders, EU Commissioner for Justice, says customers shouldn’t be “lured into” thinking they won’t see ads if they pay the subscription, or that it’s free despite the company profiting from their personal data. Companies must be transparent upfront about how they use user data, he added.

“Subscriptions as an alternative to advertising are a well-established business model across many industries,” Meta spokesperson Matt Pollard told The Verge in an email, “Subscription for no ads follows the direction of the highest court in Europe and we are confident it complies with European regulation.”

top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Delphia@lemmy.world 18 points 5 months ago (3 children)

This is all I want from companies, give me a choice. "We can mine the fuck out of your data and bombard you with adds or you can pay us $X a month to get the fully customisable user experience you want" and let me decide wether or not I want to pay the money.

[–] TheEntity@lemmy.world 59 points 5 months ago (2 children)

Only as long as there is also the third option: having nothing to do with them. With Facebook's tendrils and tentacles spread across 90% of the Internet, this is not really an option, even if you never ever visit their actual website.

[–] Timii@biglemmowski.win 1 points 4 months ago

I use NoScript (Unlock can do this too) to block Facebook and Twitter scripts on the internet. I like to think that works but don't know for sure.

[–] Delphia@lemmy.world -3 points 5 months ago

In an ideal world yes, 100% agreed.

[–] sanpo@sopuli.xyz 29 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Except that's specifically the approach FB made that's illegal in the EU.

Privacy is not something to be put behind a paywall, and it's not a real choice.

[–] lemming@sh.itjust.works 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I didn't look too deeply into it, but as I understand it, it is acceptable to make people pay a reasonable price to compensate for losses from lack of targetted advertising. The problem with what facebook did is that the price was completely dispropotionate and obviously meant to make sure most people don't pay it.

[–] sanpo@sopuli.xyz 16 points 5 months ago

The purpose of the law is that consent is supposed to be given freely - holding privacy ransom is not that.

Besides, Meta is identified as a gatekeeper under DMA, so EU might be even more strict with them.

Anyway, I'm not a lawyer, so don't quote me on any of this. :)

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 points 5 months ago
[–] DavidGarcia@feddit.nl 9 points 5 months ago
[–] autotldr@lemmings.world 3 points 5 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


The European Union says it has notified Meta that its “pay or consent” model for Facebook and Instagram might violate consumer protection laws.

The EU’s Consumer Protection Cooperation (CPC) Network says the company has until September 1st, 2024, to propose changes to its model, which it calls “misleading” and “confusing” for users, or face potential fines.

CPC regulators, who began their investigation after complaints from consumer watchdog groups, claim the company uses confusing language to explain how both the paid and “free” versions of Facebook and Instagram work and that its rollout pressured people to make a choice without enough time to consider how it would affect them.

They also say that calling the ad-free versions of Facebook and Instagram “free” is misleading since it still requires users to consent to the use of their data for targeted ads.

Didier Reynders, EU Commissioner for Justice, says customers shouldn’t be “lured into” thinking they won’t see ads if they pay the subscription, or that it’s free despite the company profiting from their personal data.

“Subscriptions as an alternative to advertising are a well-established business model across many industries,” Meta spokesperson Matt Pollard told The Verge in an email, “Subscription for no ads follows the direction of the highest court in Europe and we are confident it complies with European regulation.”


The original article contains 348 words, the summary contains 219 words. Saved 37%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!