this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2024
19 points (77.1% liked)

United States | News & Politics

7213 readers
551 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
all 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Harris would be a much stronger candidate if she was chosen by voters, rather than anointed by party insiders. Democrats can't defeat fascism by abandoning democracy.

But if you point this out you're a Russian.

[–] sovietknuckles@hexbear.net 8 points 3 months ago

You had me at "Democrats can't defeat fascism"

[–] Charlatan@lemm.ee 6 points 3 months ago

I 100% agree with BLM. It's not a no to Harris, but I am so effin' tired of getting nominees shoved down my throat. The DLC works for the people, not Kamela and Joe.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 months ago

Can't see any reason for Dems not to hold a primary aside from them being afraid Kamala would actually lose.

[–] OprahsedCreature@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 months ago

DNC: Restoring Democracy by Ignoring Democracy

[–] skozzii@lemmy.ca -2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I strongly disagree, Harris has always been on the ticket.

Two party system is fundamentally broken to start. But its funny because it seems like a bunch of Russian propaganda, claiming its Russian propaganda in these comments.