this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2024
125 points (99.2% liked)

3DPrinting

15519 readers
169 users here now

3DPrinting is a place where makers of all skill levels and walks of life can learn about and discuss 3D printing and development of 3D printed parts and devices.

The r/functionalprint community is now located at: !functionalprint@kbin.social or !functionalprint@fedia.io

There are CAD communities available at: !cad@lemmy.world or !freecad@lemmy.ml

Rules

If you need an easy way to host pictures, https://catbox.moe may be an option. Be ethical about what you post and donate if you are able or use this a lot. It is just an individual hosting content, not a company. The image embedding syntax for Lemmy is ![](URL)

Moderation policy: Light, mostly invisible

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
andypiper@lemmy.world
j4k3@lemmy.world
henry_rowengartner@lemmy.world
GrayBackgroundMusic@lemm.ee
125
Camera lens mount for astrophotography (lemmy.world)
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by bistdunarrisch@lemmy.world to c/3dprinting@lemmy.world
16 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

I found this design and it fitted my need perfectly. It is a mount for a very popular camera lens used in astrophotography. It not only functions as a weight relief for the camera but also allows to rotate the field of view. Moreover it is possible to focus the lens with the installation of a stepper motor, which will be the next step.

The single parts are screwed together with the help of threaded heat inserts. Just to make sure they are also glued together with epoxy, as the mount really needs to hold up. The screws are locked with Loctite.

Edit: Link to the mount (not my design): https://www.thingiverse.com/thing:6099113

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] bistdunarrisch@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

Glueing and screwing the parts:

One result shot with this mount (and many other accessories):

[–] papalonian@lemmy.world 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Oh my god, that's phenomenal. I was very briefly interested in astronomy and telescopes as a kid and only ever dreamed of being able to see stuff like this

[–] bistdunarrisch@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Thank you! I agree, it really is an amazing topic.

[–] sic_semper_tyrannis 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Beautiful photo. What lens is it?

[–] bistdunarrisch@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The Samyang 135mm f2.0. In some markets it‘s also called Rokinon

[–] sic_semper_tyrannis 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

You must be hooking it up to a telescope right?

[–] bistdunarrisch@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The lens is the telescope in this case. But as the focal length of 135mm is fairly short it works best for objects appearing very large in the sky. Astrophotography can get very expensive very quickly, so we try to make the most out of the equipment we have. Just like with the 3d printed mount.

[–] sic_semper_tyrannis 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I'll have to check out the lens more, out of curiosity. I'm sure astrophotography had all types of trucks of its own. I have a 300mm 2.8 lens and no way is it zoomed in enough to get that nice photo you have of a nebula.

[–] bistdunarrisch@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I can recommend this online telescope simulator where you can simulate the field of view with your equipment. Your 300mm lens should be absolutely perfect

[–] sic_semper_tyrannis 1 points 3 months ago

Thank you very much

[–] Solemn@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The full moon is about 31 arc minutes in apparent size. Andromeda is about 190 arc minutes in apparent size. Based on my Eclipse photos at 700mm, the biggest issue you're likely to have with the 300 f/2.8 is picking what part of Andromeda you want to fit in your photo.

[–] sic_semper_tyrannis 1 points 3 months ago

I'll have to learn what arc minutes are and sounds fun to try new things

[–] i_am_a_cardboard_box@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Sick that you shot this without a telescope! You must have great night skies where you live! Maybe I'll try galaxy shots as well some time, I mostly do star trails

[–] bistdunarrisch@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

Thank you! Andromeda is way bigger than most people think. That’s the reason why it is a very (maybe the most) popular target for beginners. Also there went a lot of processing into the image, so don’t let the image deceive you from the actual conditions where I live (Bortle 5 zone)

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 1 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

This is weird - I've never seen my Canon 70-200 2.8 as an astrophotography lens. I usually opt for my wide angle, fisheye, or telescope attachment.

What is it about this lens that you enjoy for astrophography specifically?

Edit: love the stepper motor addition! Very cool.

Edit: Oh! I misread. This is based on that lens! Interesting. Weird that a 135mm would be used for this!

[–] bistdunarrisch@lemmy.world 2 points 3 months ago

This lens is incredibly sharp and produces nearly no coma. Also the image is super flat and the lens also works for full frame cameras. For its high image quality it‘s also used by some more advanced astrophotographers.

As I bought it new for 400€ this was a no brainer because we can also use it for 'normal' photography.

I‘m sure your lens works well for many nebulae!