this post was submitted on 05 Aug 2024
238 points (92.5% liked)

Fuck Cars

9602 readers
1010 users here now

A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!

Rules

1. Be CivilYou may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.

2. No hate speechDon't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.

3. Don't harass peopleDon't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.

4. Stay on topicThis community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.

5. No repostsDo not repost content that has already been posted in this community.

Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.

Posting Guidelines

In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:

Recommended communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemm.ee/post/38852281

Figures published by the Welsh Government show casualty reductions as follows for the period January to March 2024, in comparison with January to March 2023:

All severities at all speeds: 811 (2024); 4348 (2023);

20mph. All severities: 300 (2024); 662 (2023)

Killed or seriously injured: 63 (2024); 144 (2023)

Slightly injured: 237 (2024); 518 (2023)

30mph. All severities: 77 (2024); 1522 (2023)

Killed or seriously injured: 15 (2024); 343 (2023)

Slightly injured: 62 (2024); 1179 (2023)

40mph. All severities: 74 (2024); 397 (2023)

Killed or seriously injured: 20 (2024); 98 (2023)

Slightly injured: 54 (2024); 299 (2023)

50mph. All severities: 94 (2024); 273 (2023)

Killed or seriously injured: 23 (2024); 67 (2023)

Slightly injured: 71(2024); 206 (2023)

60mph. All severities: 214 (2024); 1235 (2023)

Killed or seriously injured: 71 (2024); 401 (2023)

Slightly injured: 143 (2024); 834 (2023)

70mph. All severities: 52 (2024); 259 (2023)

Killed or seriously injured: 12 (2024); 73 (2023)

Slightly injured: 40 (2024); 186 (2023)

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Naich@lemmings.world 114 points 3 months ago (7 children)

“We still suspect that implementing the 20mph on the basis of saving lives is a smokescreen for the real reason behind the legislation..."

Anyone know what they think the "real reason" is?

[–] Annoyed_Crabby@monyet.cc 96 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Very likely about the war on car, where car and freedom is being "oppressed" because car people think they're the most oppressed despite the privileges of having city pave way for them to go everywhere they pleased, so they can drive like a drunken goose they are.

But of course cyclist are bad because we don't follow rule.

[–] Naich@lemmings.world 44 points 3 months ago

Car drivers - the ultimate snowflakes.

[–] rosamundi@lemmy.world 26 points 3 months ago

the New World Order, the World Economic Forum, you won't be allowed to leave your neighbourhood because 15 minute cities are coming with guards and checkpoints.

[–] Amputret@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 3 months ago

Siphoning off extra revs for powering woke.

[–] InFerNo@lemmy.ml 13 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Increased income through fines

[–] Phegan@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Do you have any studies that show an increase in ticket quantity in relation to a reduction of speed limit? I would love to read about it.

[–] BallsandBayonets@lemmings.world 9 points 3 months ago (2 children)

If it were the United States it would be to funnel more money to police departments via higher tickets.

A person who speeds in a 30mph zone isn't going to stop speeding when the limit is lowered to 20; the ticket will just be more expensive.

[–] Naich@lemmings.world 16 points 3 months ago (2 children)

They could always just not break the law. A radical solution, I know...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Why does ticket revenue go to police departments?! That's pretty fucked up.

[–] rockkicker@kbin.run 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] Naich@lemmings.world 11 points 3 months ago (2 children)
[–] rockkicker@kbin.run 15 points 3 months ago (1 children)

THE SPEED LIMIT TODAY

ME TOMORROW

[–] Naich@lemmings.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

YOU ARE NOT MAKING ANY SENSE.

[–] rockkicker@kbin.run 14 points 3 months ago (2 children)

think about it

if the government can freely impose a speed limit without being bound by these things called HUMAN RIGHTS, like the right to TRAVEL (not drive), then literally what is standing between them doing that and them dispatching their robotic mind control spiders that will drill into my brain while i sleep and make me dance like THEIR PUPPET

[–] pdxfed@lemmy.world 10 points 3 months ago

That was a measured escalation.

[–] Naich@lemmings.world 8 points 3 months ago

Fair enough. I thought it was going to be some sort of weird conspiracy theory. Yes, I think the spider rollout is due to start as soon as the 20MPH zone is established outside the Sainsbury's in Chipping Sodbury.

[–] Gork@lemm.ee 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] Naich@lemmings.world 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Eh? Can anyone explain in a way that isn't gibberish?

[–] snooggums@midwest.social 7 points 3 months ago

The joke is that the reason is gibberish.

Please clap.

[–] drkt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 months ago

He may be referring to https://control.fandom.com/wiki/Federal_Bureau_of_Control

I don't know why, but that's all the dots I can connect

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 3 points 3 months ago

It probably involves Jews.

[–] Naich@lemmings.world 77 points 3 months ago (25 children)

OK, so it'll mean fewer people killed and injured, but thousands of drivers will have literally SECONDS added to their journey time.

[–] Chee_Koala@lemmy.world 40 points 3 months ago

SECONDS, TENS OF SECONDS!! Won't everyone think of the drivers who 'feel like they are going slow' !? They don't like that feeling!!

load more comments (24 replies)
[–] Badabinski@kbin.earth 68 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The 20 mph thing is happening where I live as well (in parts of Utah), and it's being widely ignored. I don't speed in general. I especially avoid it in places where there may be kids or pets around, so I end up with some big penis truck tailgating me when I'm on those 20 mph roads. It's so frustrating because these people haven't seen what happens to pedestrians when they get hit.

Content warning, I'm going to describe an accident I saw. When I was 16, I saw a man step out onto the road about ~50-75 feet in front of a car moving at ~40 mph. The pedestrian didn't look before he stepped out, and he wasn't anywhere near a crosswalk. He looked like he was coming from a construction site and was probably just tired. Nobody was speeding and the driver had pretty admirable reflexes (I could hear the juddering from his ABS brakes).

Even with that, the guy got hit before the car could come to a stop. I saw him fly back several feet, and the thing I'll never forget is the way his head fucking bounced as it hit the pavement. The amount a person's head will bounce is just fucking awful. I'll never forget what he was like afterwards. He had a heavy concussion and a huge bruise on his head. He could barely speak and he kept pawing at the air, like he was seeing something. He kept trying to get up, to the point where someone had to hover over him to stop him from moving (he might have had spine damage). He got hit so hard that to 16 year old me, he turned from a person into an injured animal. It felt like the spark in his eyes got kicked out when his skull hit the ground. It was terrifying to see someone get their... sapience? Maybe there's a better word, but see someone get their sapience smashed out of them.

Like, the guy I saw was lucky. The driver wasn't texting and slowed down considerably, and there were multiple first responders with some degree of training. He wasn't crushed. He didn't go under the car. An ambulance was there within 5 minutes of the accident. He probably lived, and he probably didn't end up with permanent brain damage (according to the EMTs). Every time I drive through a neighborhood, I imagine a kid running out from behind something, right in front of my car. If I'm going 30-40 mph, that kid's head is gonna be doing the asphalt bounce. If I'm going 20 mph, that kid is going to shit their pants when my 3000 pound death machine stops a foot away from them.

I just wish I could make these people understand how fucking awful it is to be hit by a car. It's been more than 15 years since I saw that happen and I still feel ill when I try hard to remember it. I can't imagine how bad it feels for the driver, and how much, much worse it feels for the guy who was hit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ingalls 61 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Remember it’s every driver’s right to cause an “accident” that kills someone so they can save about 15 seconds of travel time.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 22 points 3 months ago (2 children)

The problem is that people drive at the speed they feel comfortable at.

It doesn't make any sense to put a low speed limit if the road is wide and large. They should put a low limit and decrease the road width at the same time, to make it safer for bicycles and pedestrians (it's called "road diet", search for it!).

[–] manmachine@lemmy.world 15 points 3 months ago

Well, the repost is talking about Wales, where the roads are in general very narrow, winding and full of blind corners.

[–] Fuzzy_Red_Panda@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago

I Agree. If the design of the roads are changed to make it difficult to drive faster than the speed limit, then it largely solves the enforcement issue as well, and so the public won't see it as a way for the police or city to bring in more money.

[–] Pilferjinx@lemmy.world 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

This is appropriate for high density civilian areas. Is there an issue with this speed limit in other areas? Because that would suck if there's not a lot of people around.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›