technology

23281 readers

233 users here now

On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.

Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020

Rules:

1. Obviously abide by the sitewide code of conduct. Bigotry will be met with an immediate ban
2. This community is about technology. Offtopic is permitted as long as it is kept in the comment sections
3. Although this is not /c/libre, FOSS related posting is tolerated, and even welcome in the case of effort posts
4. We believe technology should be liberating. As such, avoid promoting proprietary and/or bourgeois technology
5. Explanatory posts to correct the potential mistakes a comrade made in a post of their own are allowed, as long as they remain respectful
6. No crypto (Bitcoin, NFT, etc.) speculation, unless it is purely informative and not too cringe
7. Absolutely no tech bro shit. If you have a good opinion of Silicon Valley billionaires please manifest yourself so we can ban you.

founded 4 years ago

MODERATORS

Jadzia_Dax@hexbear.net

blashork@hexbear.net

context@hexbear.net

EmmaGoldman@hexbear.net

SexUnderSocialism@hexbear.net

gaycomputeruser@hexbear.net

ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net

Google has illegal monopoly over internet search, US judge rules (www.aljazeera.com)

submitted 3 months ago by PKMKII@hexbear.net to c/technology@hexbear.net

4 comments fedilink hide all child comments

A judge in the United States has ruled that Google spent billions of dollars to create an illegal monopoly for its search engine, exploiting its dominance to squash competition and stifle innovation.

Monday’s landmark decision that Google broke antitrust law marks the first major success for US authorities taking on the dominance of Big Tech, which has come under fire from across the political spectrum.

“The court reaches the following conclusion: Google is a monopolist, and it has acted as one to maintain its monopoly,” US District Judge Amit Mehta wrote in his 277-page ruling.

top 4 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] GVAGUY3@hexbear.net 9 points 3 months ago (2 children)

So, how are they getting rid of the Monopoly?

[–] LanyrdSkynrd@hexbear.net 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

The right move would be to break them up. Separate all the business units that collude to abuse their monopoly power.

Knowing the recent history of US anti-trust, it'll drag on for years and the government will settle for a money judgement and an agreement to stop doing things that they don't need to do anymore.

[–] hexaflexagonbear@hexbear.net 9 points 3 months ago

I think the usual move when it's a somewhat natural monopoly, is to take action against some anti-competitive behaviour. So probably google won't be able to ask you to install chrome, and maybe something like search history and personalization would be forced to use SSOs other than googles? If they get more serious maybe there'll be a crackdown on how google prioritizes results.

[–] iminsomuchpainv2@hexbear.net 9 points 3 months ago

See, this is why the law is fundamentally useless and lawyers need to be [redacted]

I figured this shit out without even thinking about it, literally, you could have asked me this 20 years ago and I'd just be like yea