this post was submitted on 25 Jul 2023
549 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

38741 readers
339 users here now

This is the official technology community of Lemmy.ml for all news related to creation and use of technology, and to facilitate civil, meaningful discussion around it.


Ask in DM before posting product reviews or ads. All such posts otherwise are subject to removal.


Rules:

1: All Lemmy rules apply

2: Do not post low effort posts

3: NEVER post naziped*gore stuff

4: Always post article URLs or their archived version URLs as sources, NOT screenshots. Help the blind users.

5: personal rants of Big Tech CEOs like Elon Musk are unwelcome (does not include posts about their companies affecting wide range of people)

6: no advertisement posts unless verified as legitimate and non-exploitative/non-consumerist

7: crypto related posts, unless essential, are disallowed

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 80 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

I see that, after people raised a whole bunch of issues with the proposal, there's a new message on the Web Integrity API repository: "An owner of this repository has limited the ability to open an issue to users that have contributed to this repository in the past." So the Google engineers' response to people pointing out the defects of the proposal was to shut down people's ability to raise issues with it. It's a good little preview of how they intend to treat the web's users.

[–] themoonisacheese@sh.itjust.works 24 points 2 years ago

It's definitely because they're cowards, but to be entirely fair this is a valid course of action when your repo suddenly gets 10k views a day.

Who am I kidding it because they can't take the hear of being this moronic

[–] drwho@beehaw.org 3 points 2 years ago

The big G's posting about it is merely a formality. They don't actually have to listen. That they closed the bug tracker on that repo so quickly is not a surprise.

[–] CaptObvious@lemmy.world 27 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I’m confused. Is this an actual proposal by Google? It is it personal musings of an engineer who may work for them? Have they tasked an engineer with floating a trial balloon?

[–] themoonisacheese@sh.itjust.works 19 points 2 years ago

The engineers on the proposal are all google employees and the presentation is consistent with proposals made as if speaking for their employers. It's not exactly common but it happens that proposals like this are made on the proposing employee's account, as google is so unfathomably large that many employees may not have push access to Google repos. However, given that this is a rather large and controversial proposal, I'd wager that this was a political decision to not "taint" official Google repos with this, enabling them to say "well it's not a proposal by Google the company we actually love our users :)"

[–] nyan@lemmy.cafe 19 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)
[–] pglpm@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 years ago
[–] drwho@beehaw.org 2 points 2 years ago

Google funds Mozilla to the tune of $450mus per year. That kind of money comes with strings. It seems likely that, some point in the relatively near future there will be a "we need to catch up with the cool kids" blog post after CoB on a Friday and the next point release of Firefox will have the WEI API implemented in it.

[–] Fredy1422@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

404 page not found. My ass google.

load more comments
view more: next ›