this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2024
10 points (60.9% liked)

Games

32463 readers
1260 users here now

Welcome to the largest gaming community on Lemmy! Discussion for all kinds of games. Video games, tabletop games, card games etc.

Weekly Threads:

What Are You Playing?

The Weekly Discussion Topic

Rules:

  1. Submissions have to be related to games

  2. No bigotry or harassment, be civil

  3. No excessive self-promotion

  4. Stay on-topic; no memes, funny videos, giveaways, reposts, or low-effort posts

  5. Mark Spoilers and NSFW

  6. No linking to piracy

More information about the community rules can be found here.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I'm currently playing mafia 2 and I like it but I wonder if I should start playing mafia 3 after since I heard people say the game is dissapointing

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Cadeillac@lemmy.world 16 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Can somebody please tell me why this is the third Mafia thread I've seen? Are they on sale or something?

Edit: nevermind, it is all the same person. Would I be a dick for suggesting they contain it to one Mafia thread?

[–] FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

No. OP is a clown. Look at his replies in one of the RDR2 threads.

[–] Cadeillac@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

The main reply is me lol

[–] aksdb@lemmy.world 14 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's an okay game, but far worse than the first two. They forced an open world onto it, and made it pretty repetitive. The DLC is more linear and feels a lot more like a typical Mafia story telling.

[–] SnotFlickerman@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 2 months ago

Oh man I remember the open-world obsession era. It's still sort of with us, but a few companies are daring to stick with linear narratives that don't allow as many branching paths, like Control or Alan Wake 2. Even non-linear narratives are being pulled off in non-open-world games like Baldur's Gate 3.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 7 points 2 months ago

I liked all three mafia games. I only just played them in the last couple years tho, so I had no idea what anybody else was saying about them.

[–] klisurovi4@midwest.social 6 points 2 months ago

The map looks and feels amazing, one of my favourite worlds in a game, and the main story missions are really, really good

BUT

To unlock said story missions you have to do multiple hours of open world tasks, most of which consist of going to an area and mindlessly killing everybody. If you enjoy grinding, you will probably like it, I have a friend who does, but I couldn't bring myself to finish it because I found unlocking the story missions mind-numbing.

[–] MeekerThanBeaker@lemmy.world 5 points 2 months ago

It's disappointing, but not a bad game.

[–] cheddar@programming.dev 4 points 2 months ago

80% of the game is:

  1. Go to location A.
  2. Kill everyone.
  3. Go somewhere else.
  4. Wait until the boss comes to location A.
  5. Go to location A again.
  6. Kill everyone again.

Most locations also look the same, they reuse the same church/warehouse/car shop model. It's boring and repetitive. Watch the story on YT.

[–] Toneswirly@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

Its boring in long stretches. The story has decent hooks but the characters are a bit too cartoony and flat. Kind of a forgetable experience.

[–] thorisalaptop@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Unpopular opinion but I preferred Mafia 3 over 2. I don’t think any of them are great games, just solid ones.

Mafia 2’s story is good, but the game started to feel pretty repetitive for me quickly. “Get in car, drive somewhere listening to a conversation to move the story forward, shoot some people, repeat until game is over.”

Mafia 3 also feels repetitive, and can definitely start to feel grindy. But I think the main missions are better designed than 2, and the combat overall also feels better and more fun. So it’s a trade off: it’s an open world game so it’s got more filler to make it longer, but when it’s good it’s better than its predecessor (IMHO).

[–] 58008@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

If they had added fast travel, it would have been a really solid game (to me, at least). The excruciatingly-long driving sessions were interminable, and it was this that made me abandon the game in the end, even though I was already about 2/3 of the way through it. The characters, acting and story were really good.

It's quite repetitive, but no more than any other middling open world game. I happen to enjoy stealthily murdering people with a giant combat knife, so the repetition didn't bother me. The constant criss-crossing around the map to go to/from objectives bothered me a lot. 90% of the checkpoints in each quest could have been a phone call.

I wonder if there's a mod that lets you teleport to map markers 🤔 If so, I would play the game again.