this post was submitted on 15 Aug 2024
123 points (83.2% liked)

Asklemmy

43942 readers
482 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I've been seeing more often (and others have posted the same) that some of the elements of "Reddit etiquette" seem to be taking over here. Luckily I can still find discussion comments but it seems the jokes and general "downvote because I disagree" are slowly taking over.

So the question becomes is it the size or the functionality of the site? The people or popularity? What's your thoughts?

edit: should I change it to Lemmy-hivemind? Exhibit A: the amount of downvotes without a single explanation (guessing it's anything to do with Reddit being talked about).

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 7 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

Between the Boston bomber and the APIpocalypse it seemed to me like the hive mind got a lot better, even on Reddit. You could find a lot of different perspectives, and it was rare for one that's definitely wrong to stay on the top. Unless you just define "hive mind" as insufficiently conservative or whatever.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] bazingabrain@hexbear.net 7 points 3 months ago

How it took over: liberalism

How to defeat it: agressive communist mods

No need to thank me 😌

[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 months ago

The hivemind comes from people caring too much about their votes or karma. Nobody likes seeing their post or comment downvoted to oblivion so they'll play things safe and just post something they know everyone will agree with. I'm not sure you can have a voting system without having some kind of a hivemind.

[–] quixotic120@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

That shit goes back way before reddit. It was a problem on digg, on 4chan, somethingawful and other vbulletin forums, Usenet, etc. it will be a problem here and every place that comes after

It’s easier to just agree with the group than do critical thinking. It’s easier to just repost the same stupid tired joke someone else just made than to be clever. etc

[–] veroxii@aussie.zone 4 points 3 months ago

Yeah I'm going to show my age here. But I've migrated from fidonet (bbs days) to Usenet. To slashdot. To digg. To Reddit. To Lemmy. And I'm 100% positive one day I'll migrate again.

Forums evolve and change. And once it changes go find your tribe again. Your peeps will still be out there especially this kinda tech leaning crowd.

I've stopped worrying about it. Humans are going to human.

[–] selokichtli@lemmy.ml 5 points 3 months ago

Isolated communities sharing rigid points of view are a problem, but I think the voting system is to blame. When someone disagrees and downvotes as a consequence, it changes the way that comment is read by the next reader, this will likely generate inertia over the way the message is read in general through time.

I can't explain why I do like to read other people's comments. Most of the time I do not bother to engage in conversations with strangers, but Lemmy has several advantages over Reddit just because it doesn't count or publish people's "karma". It's a blessing that some instances of Lemmy can also hide the voting system altogether, which is the only way I can beat the anxiety of putting my thoughts out there. I think these elements make Reddit more addictive, because a "good" number in your comments and profile confirms your membership to a given community. I believe it also shapes a "correct" way of thinking.

[–] GarbageShoot@hexbear.net 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Reddit is notorious for astroturfing. The lemmy hivemind(s) is the lemmitor hivemind from people socialized on Reddit who came to lemmy and brought that shit with them. Same with other instances like .world, but worse because they have fewer legacy users.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] xilliah@beehaw.org 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

We need proper platforms for discussion. Reddit isn't such a platform.

The reddit mechanic of using upvotes and using a sorting function optimized for engagement leads to unfavorable second order mechanics.

I'm not gonna share my thoughts on how to fix this. There are certainly experts out there who know more than me about game theory and rhetoric.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BonesOfTheMoon@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

I have a conspiracy theory take on it; I think Reddit is run by fascist admins trying to push a fascist ideology and that's why it's so toxic. I think techbros that run corporate social media platforms are all fash.

[–] Alice@beehaw.org 4 points 3 months ago

Unfortunately I think people downvoting things they disagree with is kind of inevitable. People are notoriously combative online, and if they're given an option to drown someone out, they're going to abuse it. And that makes it even easier for any sort of hivemind to kick in.

I personally don't know a better system, but it's not perfect.

[–] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.world 4 points 3 months ago

IMO: tribal thinking.

It comes down to "they do not think like I want them to or they won't agree with me, so I will downvote posts."

Controversial topics are even more downvoting just to downvote.

The self-built echo chambers are already constructed; self-censorship and anything outside of their views and sources are dismissed, labeled, and smeared so as to not think about the information being shared.

It happens everywhere; the status quo is welcomed, while anything outside of it will seem controversial or extreme.

[–] I_Miss_Daniel@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

I suspect a lack of critical thinking. Respond first, ask questions later or not at all.

[–] sbv@sh.itjust.works 3 points 3 months ago (4 children)

It's friendliness of the community and willingness to treat randos with respect. Responses here seem to fit a general pattern of "I agree and...", or "you're wrong and stupid".

I generally have a better experience on Reddit. I'm less likely to get responses, but I get fewer downvotes there and the responses are usually nicer.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: β€Ή prev next β€Ί