this post was submitted on 21 Aug 2024
-37 points (39.5% liked)

Memes

45132 readers
1493 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Tar_alcaran@sh.itjust.works 46 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

What a weird focus on the US democratic party. Every single US government has been doing this exact same thing.

[–] Rozauhtuno@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Every single US government has been doing this exact same thing.

So... both sides are evil?

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 27 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

In essence the entire US Government regardless if Republican or Democrat are complicit in this ongoing genocide.

[–] loaExMachina@sh.itjust.works 8 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

That is true, but Republican's electoral base mostly agrees with this whereas democrat's electoral base doesn't. Many Pro-republicans will gleefully vote for genocide or deny than that's what's going on. Pro-democrats, however are asked to tolerate genocide to vote for the lesser of two evils. It makes sense that the latter will protest and demand that the politicians who are supposed to represent them change their ways.

[–] DmMacniel@feddit.org 2 points 3 weeks ago

Getting rid of zionistic tendencies won't just happen during one legislative period. But I'm not deep into US Politics so I can't make any statements or suggestions how to get rid of this heinous stance.

So yeah voting democrats is the lesser evil on only this topic, while it is a way better choice regarding other more domestic issues.

[–] CaptainBasculin@lemmy.ml 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Whether the winner is Trump or Kamala, both of them will still keep supporting Israel; as their actions benefit US overall. Trump even had the chance to resolve the israel palestine crisis back when he was the president. He didn't. Why would he change policies after he's elected again?

[–] KingThrillgore@lemmy.ml -1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

Sure keep calling me the bad guy for picking the lesser evil. Maybe if you keep doing it enough, Lemmy will get more users.

[–] SonOfMothman@lemmy.world -2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

What does “finish the job “ mean to you? People In glass houses shouldn’t throw stones.

We see articles about trump talking with bibi to stall or delay any ceasefire because it’ll help Harris… you post this?

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Sounds like shipping 14,000+ 2,000 pound bombs to israel.

Sure sounds like Biden should start using his leverage over israel if he wants to achieve that ceasefire. If only he had the power to do that amiright haha.

[–] SonOfMothman@lemmy.world -2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

No, you’re not right. We have literally ZERO idea what happens in the talks for a ceasefire. Sure I agree we should just stop sending them weapons. Is it that cut and dry? And especially now with dipshit Donny and bibi talking on the side.

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

We know. Blinken goes to israel, promises Netanyahu more weapons and asks him what lie he needs to say to blame Hamas. Then Blinken goes to Egypt and tells Sisi to help israel.

And especially now with dipshit Donny and bibi talking on the side.

Half the Trump stage is israeli flags not sure why people are acting surprised at a phone call.

[–] SonOfMothman@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I can’t tell if that first period is on accident or not and it changes the entire structure and point.

If you’re saying that we know what Bliken promises and says behind closed doors I’m going to need a source.

What does not being surprised by the call matter?

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 2 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] SonOfMothman@lemmy.world 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Paywalled, can’t read it

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago)

You can bypass it by pasting the article link into archive.ph, But actually this article is even better

Blinken 'sentenced ceasefire talks to death' with Hamas

US Secretary of State Antony Blinken sentenced the Gaza ceasefire negotiations to death by implying Hamas was the obstacle to a deal and that Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu had accepted it, Israeli officials told local media.

[–] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social -3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Dear Leftists,

You claim to hate whataboutism, yet every time someone suggests voting for Harris so Trump doesn't win and thus do irreparable harm to Gaza, to large numbers of vulnerable Americans, to the climate, and to our ability to vote at all, you say "whatabout democrats". Curious!

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world -3 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

Dear Liberals,

Democrats are committing Genocide right now. Trump is not the president. It is not 2016. You can't blame Trump for Demcrats doing a Nazi Holocaust.

Kind regards.

[–] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 0 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Dear person who refuses to argue in good faith,

First of all, last I checked, Netanyahu was committing genocide, not the Democrats. Second of all, Trump has promised to funnel arms to Israel harder than Biden currently is, and he stands a very real chance of winning the 2024 election.

  1. There are two choices in the United States 2024 election. No third party stands a ghost of a chance of winning. No, not even if the 30,000 people you can reach on Lemmy all vote for Timothy Greenparty.
  2. A Trump victory in 2024 would not only be just as bad if not worse for the citizens of Gaza than Harris would, but also pose an existential threat to a large number of vulnerable Americans (trans people, immigrants, women seeking abortions).
  3. Given the margins of victory in 2016 and 2020, Kamala might not win if leftists don't vote for her.
  4. Snoozing fascism for four years is better than inviting it through the door now, and buys us time to build our defenses for when it comes back.

I'd like to focus my counterargument. Which of these statements do you disagree with?

EDIT: why am I not surprised that you left a downvote but not a reply?

[–] zeppo@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago

The dude has been told that countless times and obviously doesn’t remotely give a fuck. Makes you wonder why he’s going so hard for months on a strategy that could only result in helping Trump, huh? Sure af wouldn’t help Palestinians or “reform the democrats” as is claimed.

[–] serendepity@lemmy.world 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I’m sorry but short of a revolution (which is unlikely), or slow, measured positive change over the course of decades (which we’d still have to fight hard for), we’re stuck with a two party system and you shouldn’t blame people for sticking with the lesser of two evils. I do agree that Liberals can be heavy handed with their bans, but I guess they’re doing so to keep the discourse focused. Trump is a very real and immediate threat who might commit far more heinous crime if he becomes the president again.

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world -3 points 2 weeks ago

Policy change comes from people resisting policy with their votes. Abortion is on the agenda because people demanded it with votes. This is no different.

Enough people start demanding it and it will happen. No matter how much politicians want to sell out, they can only do so if you vote for them.