85

Twitter took Gene X Hwang's username and only offered him “some merch.”

top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[-] AToM_exe@lemmy.world 39 points 11 months ago

That's an exremly shitty thing to do. I don't know how anyone can still be behind this company..

[-] nottheengineer@feddit.de 6 points 11 months ago

If I owned it, I'd definitely be behind it.

[-] thingsiplay@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago

@nottheengineer I don't own it, and am still behind it.

[-] Anomandaris@kbin.social 8 points 11 months ago
[-] thingsiplay@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago
[-] Anomandaris@kbin.social 10 points 11 months ago

C'mon bro, it's 2023, if I have to tell you that sarcasm is difficult to determine through text then that's your fault, not mine.

[-] thingsiplay@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago

@Anomandaris No. Its your fault not mine. It's apparent from the context I replied to. Think before you reply.

[-] grte@lemmy.ca 9 points 11 months ago

Your sarcasm was not well done. Do better next time.

[-] BitterSweet@discuss.tchncs.de 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Context didn’t help you, I also presumed you supported X. Just use tone indicators to avoid any confusion. it’s two characters for “/s”. Little cringe todo initially but it helps ppl and avoids confusion.

[-] BlackPenguins@lemmy.world 7 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

If you don't put an /s at the end, SpongeBob case it, or stretch syllables in words it's not sarcasm. Learn to Internet.

[-] HeartyBeast@kbin.social 7 points 11 months ago

Unfortunately, no. If you were relying on it’s absurdity to make it look like sarcasm, you were unfortunately indistinguishable from a Musk fanboi

[-] wanderingmagus@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

The ratio says otherwise.

[-] Polar@lemmy.ca 3 points 11 months ago

While I agree, no one should be behind this shit company, it's quite a standard thing to do.

Literally every social media platform has the ability to reset a users username so they can free it up. It happens all the time.

Are you famous enough? Cool, contact any company about taking over the username "Jake" and they'll give you it. Doesn't matter that the other dudes name is Jake. Doesn't matter they had it first. Doesn't matter that it isn't a trademarked name.

[-] Art3sian@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

It didn’t work for Beyoncé. She tried to take the brand, Blu Ivy off an Australian company so her daughter could have it. Australia said get fucked.

An American wedding planner also had the name, and America told Beyoncé to get fucked too.

[-] conciselyverbose@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago

You don't have a legal right to demand it.

But the platform can just give it to you as they see fit.

[-] JustAManOnAToilet@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Just look at what happened to Jake from state farm. They even took the man's khakis.

[-] GunnarRunnar@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago

It's not really that shitty in context with Musk's everyday doings. I'm honestly not surprised at all.

If this was the worst of him, I'd be able to handle it (even though it indeed is a shitty thing to do and devalues Twitter handles [which is imo actually a good thing]).

[-] azdood85@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Musk's everyday doings

Speaking of his everyday doings. Has anyone investigated all those underage illegal migrant children he has in his bathroom shower? Or was that just a rumor started on "the app formerly known as twitter"?

[-] xc2215x@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago

It is but that is who Musk is.

[-] merfolk@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

Unfortunately the expected move from the cesspool formerly knows as Twitter.

[-] Wondrous_Fairy@lemmy.world 9 points 11 months ago

Yep, totally not surprising in the least. Imagine if you'd built up a whole following around one handle and poof, it's just gone. I think Musk got threatened by how stupid Huffman was being with Reddit and decided that the only way to be more stupid was to relabel the already flailing company.

[-] jocanib@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

Not defending the thin-skinned rich kid but the tweeter formerly known as @X didn't lose anything apart from the name. Anyone can change their @name on Twitter and keep the rest of the account intact. Twitter changed his @name so that they could change their @name. Nothing else changed on either account.

[-] Wondrous_Fairy@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

So you're not trying to belittle the fact that this guy has spent time with his X brand for a long time and now Musk is just stealing it because he feels like it? I mean, for someone who's not defending the rich, you sure do put up a valiant effort. If anything, I hope someone's trademarked X before Musk so they can sue him into oblivion for it and give him a taste of his own asshole medicine.

[-] jocanib@lemmy.world 0 points 11 months ago

There is this thing called context. And you forgot all about it.

[-] Wondrous_Fairy@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

No, the context to me is quite clear. You're attempting to assauge critique via deflection. It's like saying you shouldn't be upset that someone took a shit in your house, because at least they had the good sense to leave afterwards instead of tracking it all over your carpet. I'm not buying it and nobody else is either. Give it up already.

[-] wave_walnut@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago

I suspect this is what Eron Musk's normal attitude towards life is like.

[-] readbeanicecream@kbin.social 4 points 11 months ago

At least #twitter made it to come up with a play on brexit ...#Xit!

[-] melroy@kbin.melroy.org 1 points 11 months ago

Too soon? xD

[-] peyotecosmico@programming.dev 2 points 11 months ago

What some people don't realize it's that those usernames besides from being unique are very valuable, at the point that when someone won't sell it they get harassed until they do

[-] tjhart85@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago

Darknet Diaries did an interview with someone who was harassed for an Instagram handle and while the harassment for him was low stakes, it was high annoyance and high anxiety inducing.


Darknet Diaries: 97: The Pizza Problem

Episode webpage: https://darknetdiaries.com/episode/97

Media file: https://www.podtrac.com/pts/redirect.mp3/pdst.fm/e/chrt.fm/track/G481GD/traffic.megaphone.fm/ADV1180047426.mp3?updated=1632679018

[-] RubberStuntBaby@kbin.social 2 points 11 months ago

OK, but do they still respond with poop emojis?

[-] gon@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

I mean, it's their app. Sure it's shitty, but at the end of the day it's just a username. IDK. A minor inconvenience at most.

[-] fidodo@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Nobody is debating that it's legal. They're within their rights but it's unethical and extremely worrying since Elon's stated goal is to make X the everything app for communication, payments, and whatever else. The fact that he's more than happy to abuse his power just because he can makes the prospect of X growing horrifying. It would be an app where they own you and you own nothing.

[-] gon@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

I just see as a sign it's never gonna work. Not under Elon, not X. He's a megalomaniac idiot...

And I don't see how it's "unethical" either. It's annoying, rude, stupid, ridiculous, shitty, sure. But unethical? They didn't promise anything, they even gave some compensation even though they didn't need to, right? Ethics isn't even objective so I just don't think that's remotely meaningful, what ethical boundary are they overstepping? "To forcibly change someone's social media handle is unethical"?

IDK, just don't use Twitter!! I guess I just don't see this as a big issue because I think Twitter is dumb, I suppose if you use the app a lot... IDK.

[-] fidodo@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago

I don't use Twitter, but the reason I think this is a bigger deal is because of the stated intention to expand it's scope. Taking your account now means you can't use a shitty social media app, but it would be a huge disruption if he pulls of what he wants and shows he'll do things against his users interests if he feels like it. I won't touch anything he makes with a 10 foot poll.

[-] Maiznieks@lemmy.world 1 points 11 months ago

Oh, boy, handle with few chars can be so expensive, let alone a single char. Musk is a stinky shit.

[-] Sigma@lemmy.ml 1 points 11 months ago

X...gonna give it to me.

this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2023
85 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

19 readers
2 users here now

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on the latest developments, trends, and innovations in the world of technology. Whether you are a tech enthusiast, a developer, or simply curious about the latest gadgets and software, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on topics such as artificial intelligence, robotics, cloud computing, cybersecurity, and more. From the impact of technology on society to the ethical considerations of new technologies, this category covers a wide range of topics related to technology. Join the conversation and let's explore the ever-evolving world of technology together!

founded 1 year ago